journal article Dec 18, 2020

Adaptive and Maladaptive Bodily Awareness: Distinguishing Interoceptive Sensibility and Interoceptive Attention from Anxiety‐Induced Somatization in Autism and Alexithymia

Autism Research Vol. 14 No. 2 pp. 240-247 · Wiley
Abstract
There is growing interest in “interoception” (i.e., detection and interpretation of internal body signals) as a relevant mechanism contributing to certain symptoms and features of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and alexithymia. However, inconsistent measurement and operationalization of interoception has led to confusion and inconsistent findings in the literature. In this commentary, we present alternative interpretations of findings from existing studies to demonstrate that ASD and alexithymia are conditions associated with reduced adaptive forms of interoceptive attention (i.e., attention toward bodily signals) but heightened maladaptive forms of interoceptive attention related to anxiety‐induced somatization. Differentiating adaptive and maladaptive forms of interoceptive attention reveals a clearer pattern of findings in the research literature for further investigation of interoceptive processes that are involved in the neurobiology of ASD. However, interoception is a complex and multi‐faceted construct that requires continual refinement in conceptualization and operationalization. Interoception research may benefit from self‐report measures that clearly differentiate adaptive and maladaptive forms of bodily awareness.Lay SummarySome research suggests that autistic people have difficulty understanding bodily feelings such as hunger, illness, or emotions, whereas some studies have reported the opposite pattern of findings. We argue that this latter subset of studies reached false conclusions from using measures of bodily awareness that largely measure physical symptoms of anxiety. While attention to unpleasant bodily signals is an important ability necessary for maintaining healthy bodily functioning, excessive attention, and worry toward bodily signals can increase anxiety and be harmful.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
62
[3]
Babbie E. (2009)
[4]
Baughman O. L. "Rapid diagnosis and treatment of anxiety and depression in primary care: the somatizing patient" Journal of Family Practice (1994)
[12]
How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness

A. D. (Bud) Craig

Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10.1038/nrn2555
[25]
The Association Between Anxiety, Depression, and Somatic Symptoms in a Large Population: The HUNT-II Study

Tone Tangen Haug, Arnstein Mykletun, Alv A. Dahl

Psychosomatic Medicine 10.1097/01.psy.0000145823.85658.0c
[32]
The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2)

Wolf E. Mehling, Michael Acree, Anita Stewart et al.

PLoS ONE 10.1371/journal.pone.0208034
[35]
The Feeling of Me Feeling for You: Interoception, Alexithymia and Empathy in Autism

Cari-lène Mul, Steven D. Stagg, Bruno Herbelin et al.

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 10.1007/s10803-018-3564-3
[38]
Murphy J. "Validation of the interoceptive accuracy scale (IAS) supports distinction between self‐reported interoceptive accuracy and awareness" PsyArXiv Preprints (2018)
[46]
Porges S. (1993)

Showing 50 of 62 references

Metrics
62
Citations
62
References
Details
Published
Dec 18, 2020
Vol/Issue
14(2)
Pages
240-247
License
View
Cite This Article
Dominic A. Trevisan, Wolf E. Mehling, James C. McPartland (2020). Adaptive and Maladaptive Bodily Awareness: Distinguishing Interoceptive Sensibility and Interoceptive Attention from Anxiety‐Induced Somatization in Autism and Alexithymia. Autism Research, 14(2), 240-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2458