Polyethylene furanoate: technoeconomic analysis of biobased production

Janus Louw; Somayeh Farzad; Johann F. Görgens

doi:10.1002/bbb.2430

journal article Open Access Sep 20, 2022

Polyethylene furanoate: technoeconomic analysis of biobased production

Janus Louw

Somayeh Farzad

Johann F. Görgens

Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining Vol. 17 No. 1 pp. 135-152 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/bbb.2430

Abstract

AbstractAn economically viable scenario for production of polyethylene furanoate (PEF) is key to unlocking the potential for the replacement of the oil derivative polyethylene terephthalate (PET) by PEF. This work aims to provide a baseline for, and deeper insights into, the mass, energy, and economic performance of PEF production in integrated bioenergy self‐sufficient biorefineries. Alternative configurations for the production of PEF from A‐molasses (1G), sugarcane bagasse and trash (2G), or combinations of them (1G2G) were simulated as integrated sugarcane biorefineries – designed to be bio‐energy self‐sufficient – in Aspen Plus. Utilization of the existing boiler of the sugar mill accompanied by a small medium pressure boiler was sufficient to meet the energy demands of the combined sugar mill and biorefinery for the 1G scenario. Conversely, the increased energy demand of the 2G and 1G2G scenarios required replacement of the existing sugar mill boiler with a new combined heat and power plant. The profitability of each scenario was assessed in terms of the required minimum selling price (MSP) for an acceptable return on investment. The 2G PEF scenario was the least profitable with a MSP of 4.26 USD kg−1, whereas the 1G2G scenario (MSP of 2.39 USD kg−1) was more profitable due to economies of scale and other synergistic benefits of feedstock co‐processing, such as increased sugar concentration, which reduced the energy demands and the cost of downstream recovery. The 1G PEF scenario was the most profitable due to low capital cost and energy requirements associated with 1G conversion, with an MSP of 1.82 USD kg−1, approximately 77% higher than the market price of fossil‐based PET in 2019 (1.03 USD kg−1) to which PEF is functionally equivalent. The MSPs of PEF determined in this work is competitive with Avantium's forecast PEF market prices for mainstream and high value applications and the insights provided could encourage further development of sustainable PEF biorefineries. © 2022 The Authors. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining published by Society of Industrial Chemistry and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

54

[1]

10.4324/9780429201998‐6

[2]

10.2527/af.2013‐0010

[3]

10.1016/j.ces.2014.07.035

[4]

10.1007/s12155‐016‐9732‐4

[5]

10.1186/s13068‐018‐1130‐z

[6]

10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.048

[7]

10.1186/s13068‐017‐0761‐9

[8]

10.3303/cet1437075

[9]

Integrated versus stand-alone second generation ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse and trash

Marina O.S. Dias, Tassia L. Junqueira, Otávio Cavalett et al.

Bioresource Technology 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.120

[10]

10.1016/j.cherd.2009.06.020

[11]

10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.042

[12]

10.1002/bbb.2122

[13]

GarsideM.Production of plastics worldwide from 1950 to 2019.2020. Available at:https://www.statista.com/statistics/282732/global‐production‐of‐plastics‐since‐1950/. Accessed 2020.

[14]

10.17265/1934‐7359/2015.02.007

[15]

10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.086

[16]

European Bioplastics and Nova‐Institute (2019)

[17]

Avantium.FDCA and plantMEG™ together make a 100% plant‐based plastic PEF. Available at:https://www.avantium.com/lead‐products/. Accessed 2021.

[18]

10.1126/sciadv.aap9722

[19]

10.1039/c2ee02480b

[20]

10.1039/d0gc03991h

[21]

10.1039/d1gc00721a

[22]

10.1039/c9ee00447e

[23]

10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124237

[24]

10.3390/polym13223883

[25]

10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124072

[26]

10.1016/j.rser.2021.112059

[27]

10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130585

[28]

10.1016/j.enconman.2013.07.024

[29]

10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.074

[30]

Smith G (2015)

[31]

10.1186/1754‐6834‐7‐105

[32]

Humbird D (2011)

[33]

10.1002/cben.201600025

[34]

Cameron G "Process design for the production of ethylene from ethanol" Senior Design Reports (2012)

[35]

10.2202/1934‐2659.1231

[36]

10.1016/j.jngse.2013.01.004

[37]

Perzon H (2015)

[38]

CO2 capture with potassium carbonate solutions: A state-of-the-art review

Tohid Nejad Ghaffar Borhani, Abbas Azarpour, Vahid Akbari et al.

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.026

[39]

10.1007/s10563‐010‐9094‐4

[40]

10.1021/cs401160y

[41]

Intratec.Technology profile: polyethylene furanoate production (PEF).2019. Available at:https://bioplasticsnews.com/2019/05/03/technology‐profile‐polyethylene‐furanoate‐production‐pef/.

[42]

10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113768

[43]

10.1002/bbb.2020

[44]

Leibbrandt NH (2010)

[45]

Turton R (2013)

[46]

OECD/FAO (2019)

[47]

10.1039/d0gc04353b

[48]

NREL.Hydrogen Production Cost Estimate Using Biomass Gasification.NREL/BK‐6A10‐51726.2011: Available at:http://www.osti.gov/bridge.

[49]

Vickers J (2020)

[50]

10.1007/s00253‐019‐09640‐2

Showing 50 of 54 references

Cited By

34

Depolymerized Poly(ethylene-2,5-furanoate) as a Sustainable Feedstock for Biobased Unsaturated Polyester Resins

Tomáš Foltýn, Jan Všetečka · 2025

Macromolecules

Recent developments in solvent and catalyst selection for 5-hydroxymethylfurfural oxidation to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid

Jacob M. Molinaro, Joel Swartzentruber · 2025

EES Catalysis

Comparative techno-economics of 1,3-butadiene production from sugarcane feedstocks via ethanol or 2,3-butanediol as intermediates

Mirelle René Gouws, Eunice Sefakor Dogbe · 2024

Industrial Crops and Products

Metrics

34

Citations

54

References

Details

Published: Sep 20, 2022
Vol/Issue: 17(1)
Pages: 135-152
License: View

Authors

J

Janus Louw

Department of Process Engineering Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa

S

Somayeh Farzad

Department of Process Engineering Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa

J

Johann F. Görgens

Department of Process Engineering Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa

Cite This Article

Janus Louw, Somayeh Farzad, Johann F. Görgens (2022). Polyethylene furanoate: technoeconomic analysis of biobased production. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 17(1), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2430

Polyethylene furanoate: technoeconomic analysis of biobased production

You May Also Like