The Martyrdom Effect: When Pain and Effort Increase Prosocial Contributions

Christopher Y. Olivola; Eldar Shafir

doi:10.1002/bdm.767

journal article Dec 22, 2011

The Martyrdom Effect: When Pain and Effort Increase Prosocial Contributions

Christopher Y. Olivola Eldar Shafir

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making Vol. 26 No. 1 pp. 91-105 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/bdm.767

Abstract

ABSTRACTMost theories of motivation and behavior (and lay intuitions alike) consider pain and effort to be deterrents. In contrast to this widely held view, we provide evidence that the prospect of enduring pain and exerting effort for a prosocial cause can promote contributions to the cause. Specifically, we show that willingness to contribute to a charitable or collective cause increases when the contribution process is expected to be painful and effortful rather than easy and enjoyable. Across five experiments, we document this “martyrdom effect,” show that the observed patterns defy standard economic and psychological accounts, and identify a mediator and moderator of the effect. Experiment 1 showed that people are willing to donate more to charity when they anticipate having to suffer to raise money. Experiment 2 extended these findings to a non‐charity laboratory context that involved real money and actual pain. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the martyrdom effect is not the result of an attribute substitution strategy (whereby people use the amount of pain and effort involved in fundraising to determine donation worthiness). Experiment 4 showed that perceptions of meaningfulness partially mediate the martyrdom effect. Finally, Experiment 5 demonstrated that the nature of the prosocial cause moderates the martyrdom effect: the effect is strongest for causes associated with human suffering. We propose that anticipated pain and effort lead people to ascribe greater meaning to their contributions and to the experience of contributing, thereby motivating higher prosocial contributions. We conclude by considering some implications of this puzzling phenomenon. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

64

[1]

10.1016/j.jebo.2008.01.004

[2]

10.1037/h0047195

[3]

The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Reuben M. Baron, David A. Kenny

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

[4]

Barry P.(2006 November 29).Glass act!Surrey & Hants Star. Retrieved March 29 2008 fromhttp://www.shstar.co.uk/

[5]

10.1086/261880

[6]

10.1037/h0024835

[7]

10.1111/1467-937x.00253

[8]

Incentives and Prosocial Behavior

ROLAND BÉNABOU, Jean Tirole

American Economic Review 10.1257/aer.96.5.1652

[9]

Berns G. (2005)

[10]

Bentham J. (1988)

[11]

Birks B.(2006 October 25).Sedgley firewalk.BBC Black Country. Retrieved March 29 2008 fromhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/blackcountry/

[12]

Camerer C. (2003)

[13]

Cormack M. (2002) 10.1093/oso/9780195149999.001.0001

[14]

Cryder C. (2010)

[15]

Dickert S. (2010)

[16]

Fenster T.(2011 February 17).Polar plungers freeze for fundraiser.The Stylus. Retrieved February 25 2011 fromhttp://www.thestylus.net/

[17]

Fields R. M. (2004) 10.5040/9798400683206

[18]

10.1515/9781503620766

[19]

Firewalkers blaze a trail for charity. (2004 October 21).Haverhill Weekly News. Retrieved March 29 2008 fromhttp://www.haverhill‐news.com

[20]

Gardiner R.(2007 July 16).Discovering how lucky we are.Times Online. Retrieved January 11 2009 fromhttp://www.times.co.nz/

[21]

Glucklich A. (2001)

[22]

A Fine is a Price

Uri Gneezy, Aldo Rustichini

The Journal of Legal Studies 10.1086/468061

[23]

10.1177/0146167206291006

[24]

10.1006/obhd.1999.2826

[25]

Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games

ELIZABETH HOFFMAN, Kevin McCabe, Keith Shachat et al.

Games and Economic Behavior 10.1006/game.1994.1056

[26]

10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.576

[27]

Hull C. L. (1943)

[28]

10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004

[29]

10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00589.x

[30]

10.1016/s1090-5138(01)00086-1

[31]

10.2307/2525140

[32]

Kenderdine A.(2011 February 4).Polar plunge at Lake Anne.The Washington Post. Retrieved February 25 2011 fromhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/

[33]

Kohn A. (1999)

[34]

10.1016/1053-5357(92)90025-3

[35]

Ledyard J. (1995) 10.1515/9780691213255-004

[36]

Lewin S. B. "Economics and psychology: Lessons for our own day from the early twentieth century" Journal of Economic Literature (1996)

[37]

10.1037/h0022224

[38]

Liu W. (2010)

[39]

10.1086/588699

[40]

10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x

[41]

10.1111/j.1467-6435.1999.tb00221.x

[42]

10.1002/bdm.3960070302

[43]

10.3758/bf03212961

[44]

10.3758/bf03212964

[45]

Olivola C. Y. &Shafir E.(2011).Blood sweat and cheers: The martyrdom effect extended to others. Unpublished manuscript University of Warwick.

[46]

Oppenheimer D. M. (2010)

[47]

Oxford English Dictionary Online. (2008 June). Oxford University Press. Retrieved August 4 2008 fromhttp://dictionary.oed.com/

[48]

Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk

Gabriele Paolacci, Jesse Chandler, Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis

Judgment and Decision Making 10.1017/s1930297500002205

[49]

Proctor R. W. (1990)

[50]

Pub‐goers walk on fire for charity. (2002 December 6).BBC News. Retrieved March 29 2008 fromhttp://news.bbc.co.uk

Showing 50 of 64 references

Metrics

147

Citations

64

References

Details

Published: Dec 22, 2011
Vol/Issue: 26(1)
Pages: 91-105
License: View

Authors

C

Christopher Y. Olivola

University of Warwick UK

E

Eldar Shafir

Princeton University USA

Cite This Article

Christopher Y. Olivola, Eldar Shafir (2011). The Martyrdom Effect: When Pain and Effort Increase Prosocial Contributions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.767

The Martyrdom Effect: When Pain and Effort Increase Prosocial Contributions

You May Also Like