journal article Nov 03, 2020

The British State’s production of the Muslim School: A simultaneity of categories of difference analysis

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/berj.3690
Abstract
Recently, national populist politics has been translated with the emergence of two overlapping narratives of Islamophobia and anti‐EU immigration media discourses. Such discourses have been made highly visible in the increased spike in hate crimes that have been a hidden cost of the national(ist) debate about Britain leaving the European Union (Brexit). This is the context in which we can trace a remarkable shift in the state representation of the schooling of the South Asian/Muslim community and the reclassification from promoting South Asians as central to the future of a modernised multicultural Britain (1970s) to positioning Muslims as a ‘suspect community’ (2020). This article unpacks two cultural moments in the critical exploration of the State production of the Muslim School within a post‐Trojan Horse era. First, a national dominant image of the Muslim School operating within the State ascribed ‘no‐go’ ethno‐religious Muslim neighbourhoods, as a repository of regressive (extreme) Islamist religiosity; thus, reconstructing their religious belief as racialised identities, as they disconnect from British values. Second, the No Outsiders programme, with the accompanying framing of intolerant (Muslim) parents. In this case, the ensuing tension between ‘homophobic Muslims’ and ‘British values’ sets in place a homogenisation of differences. Deploying a simultaneity of categories of difference perspective, we address an underlying discursive re‐politicising of South Asian ethnic communities as religious communities, which is resulting in a perpetual negotiation of the meanings attached to being Muslim. This will enable an international application of the article beyond the specific focus on the city of Birmingham, identified in the international media as the Jihadi capital of Europe.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
68
[3]
Benn M.(2018 August 9)English schools are broken. Only radical action will fix them The Guardian.
[4]
Bennhold K.(2014 July 22) Report cites ‘aggressive’ Islamic push in British city’s schools New York Times.
[5]
Bennhold K.&deFreytas‐Tamura K.(2017 March 26)Why do all the Jihadis come to Birmingham? New York Times.
[6]
Bhopal K. (2011)
[9]
Brown J.(2014 April 14)Operation Trojan Horse: Now 25 Birmingham schools under investigation for alleged Islamic extremist takeover plot The Independent.
[11]
Choudhury T. (2007)
[12]
Clark L.&Osbourne L.(2014 March 7)Revealed: Islamist plot dubbed 'Trojan Horse' to replace teachers in Birmingham schools with radicals Daily Mail.
[16]
Department for Communities and Local Government (2016)
[17]
Doutrich D. "Identity, ethics and cultural safety: Strategies for change" Whitireia Nursing and Health Journal (2014)
[21]
HM Government (2011)
[24]
Home Office(2015)Counter‐Terrorism and Security Act. Available online at:www.gov.uk/government/collections/counter‐terrorism‐and‐security‐bill. (accessed 28 September 2020)
[27]
Irving L.S. (2016)
[31]
Kundnani A. (2009)
[32]
Lewis P.(2010 June 17)Birmingham stops Muslim CCTV surveillance scheme The Guardian.
[33]
Mac an Ghaill M.(1994)The Making of Men.Buckingham:Open University Press
[39]
Mirza H.S. "Empowering Muslim girls? Post‐feminism, multi‐culturalism and the production of the ‘model’ Muslim student in British schools" British Journal of Sociology of Education (2017)
[42]
Nagle J. (2009)
[49]
Ragazzi F. (2015)

Showing 50 of 68 references

Metrics
9
Citations
68
References
Details
Published
Nov 03, 2020
Vol/Issue
47(2)
Pages
264-278
License
View
Cite This Article
Mairtin Mac an Ghaill, Chris Haywood (2020). The British State’s production of the Muslim School: A simultaneity of categories of difference analysis. British Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 264-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3690