journal article Open Access Oct 01, 2025

Technology‐enhanced learning in higher education institutions: Exploring the lived experiences of students with specific learning differences and their lecturers

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/berj.70039
Abstract
Abstract
This paper challenges the prevailing assumption that technology‐enhanced learning (TEL) inherently benefits all students in higher education, examining how undergraduate students with specific learning differences (SpLDs) and/or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) use technology for learning. Through qualitative interviews with 20 students and 17 lecturers at a mid‐sized UK university, we argue that while TEL offers flexibility and multimodal access to learning, it is also mediated by exclusionary institutional contexts. We support this argument by exploring how institutional and pedagogical misalignments may hinder effective technological integration for students with SpLDs. Following Abbot (2007a), we also argue that digital inclusivity cannot be achieved solely through technology; rather, it requires a contextual understanding of individual learner needs, institutional practices and lecturer preparedness. We emphasise that to ensure students with SpLDs and/or ASD benefit from the increasing reliance on technology in higher education, institutions need to develop a holistic policy approach that takes cognisance of the complex interaction between technology, the individual and the university context.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
49
[1]
Abbott C.(2007a) E‐inclusion: Learning difficulties and digital technologies. Futurelab.
[2]
Abbott C. (2007)
[8]
Borkin H. &Disabled Students' Commission [DSA]. (2022).Exploring the impact of Covid‐19 on disabled students' experiences: In‐depth qualitative report.https://www.advance‐he.ac.uk/knowledge‐hub/exploring‐impact‐covid‐19‐disabled‐students‐experiences‐depth‐qualitative‐report
[9]
Using thematic analysis in psychology

Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke

Qualitative Research in Psychology 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[10]
Braun V. (2014)
[11]
British Educational Research Association [BERA] (2024)
[14]
D’Angelo I. (2019)
[16]
Disabled Students UK. (2022).Going back is not a choice.https://disabledstudents.co.uk/not‐a‐choice/
[17]
Disabled Students UK. (2023).Access insights report 2023 framework and baseline.https://disabledstudents.co.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2023/11/Disabled‐Students‐UK_Access‐Insights‐2023‐Report.pdf
[23]
Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2025a).Who's studying in HE?https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data‐and‐analysis/students/whos‐in‐he
[24]
Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2025b).Table 15‐UK permanent address student enrolments by disability and sex 2014/15 to 2023/24.https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data‐and‐analysis/students/table‐15
[26]
Hubble S. (2021)
[27]
Jisc (2023)
[28]
Kelly M. A. (2010)
[29]
Kiersey R. (2018)
[30]
[31]
Lane L. (2014)
[40]
Office for Students. (2017).Higher education and research act 2017.Legislation.gov.uk https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2017/29/section/32/enacted
[42]
Robson C. (2011)
[47]
United Nations (2015)
[49]
Yu W. W. "Pedagogy and technology infusion" The Journal of Research in Business Education (2017)
Metrics
1
Citations
49
References
Details
Published
Oct 01, 2025
Vol/Issue
52(2)
Pages
864-885
License
View
Cite This Article
Alexia Achtypi, Abass B. Isiaka, Jeremy Schildt, et al. (2025). Technology‐enhanced learning in higher education institutions: Exploring the lived experiences of students with specific learning differences and their lecturers. British Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 864-885. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70039