journal article Open Access Oct 06, 2025

To protect and preserve? Explaining the gap between structural and superficial racial equality regimes in North Atlantic Rim universities

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/berj.70045
Abstract
Abstract

This article examines how UK and US universities manage racial equality regimes through governance structures that prioritise institutional reputation over substantive racial justice reform. Drawing on Bourdieu's field, habitus and capital theory, the study demonstrates how universities neutralise racial justice efforts through bureaucratic inertia, funding control and managerial containment. The analysis is based on qualitative data from 138 university employees across 88 institutions, revealing that racial justice work is systematically depoliticised to align with institutional branding rather than structural transformation. The study introduces the
colour–power matrix
, a diagnostic model that maps how power and capital are distributed within universities to maintain racial hierarchies while outwardly promoting diversity. It highlights the role of HR and University Senior Management Teams (USMTs) in shaping racial equality initiatives as non‐performative, ensuring they pose no real challenge to institutional structures. Policy recommendations include redistributing decision‐making power to subaltern‐led governance bodies, reforming HR accountability structures and creating independent racial justice oversight panels. The findings contribute to critical policy studies, decolonial education research and institutional sociology, offering insights into how universities can move beyond symbolic inclusion towards genuine structural change in racial justice work.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
91
[1]
Inequality Regimes

JOAN ACKER

Gender & Society 10.1177/0891243206289499
[4]
AdvanceHE (2020)
[6]
Ahmed S. "How not to do things with words" Wagadu (2016)
[7]
Allsop D. "Qualitative methods with Nvivo software: A practical guide for analyzing qualitative data" The Psychiatrist (2022)
[9]
Armstrong M. (2023)
[12]
Bell D. (1992)
[13]
Making Black Lives Matter in academia: A Black feminist call for collective action against anti‐blackness in the academy

Myrtle P. Bell, Daphne Berry, Joy Leopold et al.

Gender, Work & Organization 10.1111/gwao.12555
[16]
Bonilla‐Silva E. (2021)
[17]
Bourdieu P. (1984)
[18]
Bourdieu P. (1992)
[22]
From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World

Patricia Bromley, Walter W. Powell

Academy of Management Annals 10.5465/19416520.2012.684462
[24]
Brunsson N. (1991)
[29]
Charlton M. (1978)
[30]
Reputation Management in Public Agencies: The Relevance of Time, Sector, Audience, and Tasks

Tom Christensen, Åse Gornitzka

Administration & Society 10.1177/0095399718771387
[31]
Clayton A. (1994)
[33]
Loronha L. (2020)
[34]
Oliveira Andreotti V. "Mapping interpretations of decolonization in the context of higher education" Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society (2015)
[37]
Denscombe M. "Decolonial research methodology: An assessment of the challenge to established practice" International Journal of Social Research Methodology (2024)
[38]
Downes M. "University scandal, reputation and governance" International Journal for Educational Integrity (2017)
[42]
Fantina R. (2013)
[43]
Freire P. (1973)
[49]
Halberstam D. (1972)

Showing 50 of 91 references

Metrics
0
Citations
91
References
Details
Published
Oct 06, 2025
Vol/Issue
52(2)
Pages
952-974
License
View
Cite This Article
DAVID ROBERTS (2025). To protect and preserve? Explaining the gap between structural and superficial racial equality regimes in North Atlantic Rim universities. British Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 952-974. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70045