Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload
Background
Surgeons in the operating theatre deal constantly with high-demand tasks that require simultaneous processing of a large amount of information. In certain situations, high cognitive load occurs, which may impact negatively on a surgeon's performance. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the different methods used to assess surgeons' cognitive load, and a critique of the reliability and validity of current assessment metrics.
Methods
A search strategy encompassing MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, PROSPERO and the Cochrane database was developed to identify peer-reviewed articles published from inception to November 2016. Quality was assessed by using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). A summary table was created to describe study design, setting, specialty, participants, cognitive load measures and MERSQI score.
Results
Of 391 articles retrieved, 84 met the inclusion criteria, totalling 2053 unique participants. Most studies were carried out in a simulated setting (59 studies, 70 per cent). Sixty studies (71 per cent) used self-reporting methods, of which the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was the most commonly applied tool (44 studies, 52 per cent). Heart rate variability analysis was the most used real-time method (11 studies, 13 per cent).
Conclusion
Self-report instruments are valuable when the aim is to assess the overall cognitive load in different surgical procedures and assess learning curves within competence-based surgical education. When the aim is to assess cognitive load related to specific operative stages, real-time tools should be used, as they allow capture of cognitive load fluctuation. A combination of both subjective and objective methods might provide optimal measurement of surgeons' cognition.
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
George A. Miller
Sandra G. Hart
Showing 50 of 118 references
Sebahat Selin Sahin, Cagri Zengin · 2026
Georges Pfister, Emeric Saguin · 2026
Egide Abahuje, Katherine A. Lin · 2026
Liam Wietzorrek, Eugenie Craenen · 2026
Lachlan Dick, Victoria Ruth Tallentire · 2025
Emma E. Howie, Olivia Ambler · 2024
Shing Wai Wong, Philip Crowe · 2024
Emma E Howie, Harini Dharanikota · 2023
Jennifer Zamudio, Jeffrey Woodward · 2023
Rizwan A. Manji, Jacqueline S. Manji · 2021
Hannes Devos, Kathleen Gustafson · 2020
Lauren R. Kennedy-Metz, Hill L. Wolfe · 2020
Roger D. Dias, Marco A. Zenati · 2019
- Published
- Feb 21, 2018
- Vol/Issue
- 105(5)
- Pages
- 491-501
- License
- View
You May Also Like
F D McDermott, A Heeney · 2015
734 citations
G S Collins, J B Reitsma · 2015
732 citations
K Mortensen, M NILSSON · 2014
645 citations
S Mulier, P Mulier · 2002
575 citations