A configural model of analytics capabilities, ambidexterity, co‐opetition, and firm performance in the supply chain context

Mohamed Dawood Shamout

doi:10.1002/bsd2.228

journal article Nov 02, 2022

A configural model of analytics capabilities, ambidexterity, co‐opetition, and firm performance in the supply chain context

Mohamed Dawood Shamout

Business Strategy & Development Vol. 6 No. 2 pp. 128-139 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/bsd2.228

Abstract

AbstractLogistics and supply chain excellence has become increasingly important as a source of competitive differentiation. Firms' efforts to achieve supply chain excellence include developing supply chain ambidexterity, co‐opetition relationships, and analytical capabilities. This study draws on the co‐opetition theory to investigate the combined role of supply chain co‐opetition, ambidexterity, and analytical abilities in determining higher firm performance. Using field data from individuals occupying managerial positions in United Arab Emirates businesses (n = 151), we applied structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy sets techniques to assess the research proposition. The SEM results suggest that (1) supply chain co‐opetition and analytical capabilities have significant effects on firm performance, but supply chain ambidexterity does not. Through fuzzy sets, we found that (2) supply chain co‐opetition, ambidexterity, and analytical capabilities are necessary causal conditions for high firm performance. We also discovered that (3) supply chain co‐opetition all by itself, and (4), supply chain ambidexterity and analytical capabilities are sufficient causal conditions for high firm performance. This study provides a novel comprehension of the benefits of supply chain co‐opetition and analytical capabilities during the COVID‐19 pandemic, offering several theoretical and managerial implications.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

70

[1]

10.1108/ijopm-09-2017-0555

[2]

Achieving supply chain resilience: the role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility

Haris Aslam, Abdul Qadeer Khan, Kamran Rashid et al.

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 10.1108/jmtm-07-2019-0263

[3]

10.1108/10595421011029893

[4]

A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding

Maria Bengtsson, Tatbeeq Raza-Ullah

Industrial Marketing Management 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.003

[5]

10.1111/jscm.12033

[6]

10.7146/jod.18173

[7]

Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research

Richard W. Brislin

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 10.1177/135910457000100301

[8]

10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100610

[9]

10.1057/ejis.2013.4

[10]

10.4324/9780203771587

[11]

10.1007/s12652-020-02617-4

[12]

10.1108/qmr-11-2016-0109

[13]

Dubai Future Foundation. (2022).Life after Covid‐19: Future Trends Logistics Report Highlights. Retrieved June 14 2022 from.https://www.dubaifuture.ae/insights/?article-type=report

[14]

10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.05.003

[15]

Elayan M. B. "Knowledge‐based HR practices, π‐shaped skills and innovative performance in the contemporary organizations" Kybernetes

[16]

10.1007/s10639-021-10580-6

[17]

Emirate News Agency. (2020).652 885 business licenses issued in June 2020. Retrieved March 12 2021 from.https://wam.ae/en/details/1395302852549

[18]

Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses

Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner et al.

Behavior Research Methods 10.3758/brm.41.4.1149

[19]

Fernandez A.‐S. (2019)

[20]

Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research

Peer C. Fiss

Academy of Management Journal 10.5465/amj.2011.60263120

[21]

Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics

Claes Fornell, David F. Larcker

Journal of Marketing Research 10.1177/002224378101800313

[22]

10.1080/00207543.2019.1668070

[23]

10.1016/j.dss.2019.03.004

[24]

10.1016/j.jsis.2017.10.001

[25]

10.1177/0149206318788945

[26]

10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107956

[27]

10.1016/s0272-6963(15)00056-x

[28]

Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance

Angappa Gunasekaran, Thanos Papadopoulos, Rameshwar Dubey et al.

Journal of Business Research 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.004

[29]

Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis

Joe F. Hair, Matt C. Howard, Christian Nitzl

Journal of Business Research 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069

[30]

When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM

Joseph F. Hair, Jeffrey J. Risher, Marko Sarstedt et al.

European Business Review 10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203

[31]

10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

[32]

10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101914

[33]

10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

[34]

10.1002/bsd2.49

[35]

Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles

John Hulland, Hans Baumgartner, Keith Marion Smith

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 10.1007/s11747-017-0532-y

[36]

10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.016

[37]

Khuong N. V. "The mediating mechanism of earnings management on the relationship between life cycle and financial reporting quality: Finding from MRA and fsQCA" Business Strategy & Development

[38]

10.1016/j.jom.2009.12.002

[39]

Ambidextrous supply chain as a dynamic capability: building a resilient supply chain

Sang M Lee, Jin Sung Rha

Management Decision 10.1108/md-12-2014-0674

[40]

Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration

Michael H. Lubatkin, Zeki Simsek, Yan Ling et al.

Journal of Management 10.1177/0149206306290712

[41]

10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108150

[42]

10.1016/j.procs.2014.12.014

[43]

10.1108/whatt-05-2022-0054

[44]

Nissen M. &Martens M.(2020).Increased leeway for cooperation between Pharma and Medical Equipment companies during the COVID‐19 crisis. Retrieved June 2021 from.https://www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2020/global/increased‐leeway‐for‐cooperation‐between‐pharma‐and‐medical‐equipment‐companies

[45]

10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102128

[46]

Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing

Ilias O. Pappas, Arch G. Woodside

International Journal of Information Management 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310

[47]

Impact of coopetition in the alliance portfolio and coopetition experience on firm innovation

Byung-Jin (Robert) Park, Manish K. Srivastava, Devi R. Gnyawali

Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10.1080/09537325.2014.913016

[48]

10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.003

[49]

Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It

Philip M. Podsakoff, Scott B. MacKenzie, Nathan P. Podsakoff

Annual Review of Psychology 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

[50]

Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: a panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms

Cristina Quintana-García, Carlos A. Benavides-Velasco

Technovation 10.1016/s0166-4972(03)00060-9

Showing 50 of 70 references

Metrics

14

Citations

70

References

Details

Published: Nov 02, 2022
Vol/Issue: 6(2)
Pages: 128-139
License: View

Authors

M

Mohamed Dawood Shamout

College of Business Administration, University of Sharjah Sharjah United Arab Emirates

Cite This Article

Mohamed Dawood Shamout (2022). A configural model of analytics capabilities, ambidexterity, co‐opetition, and firm performance in the supply chain context. Business Strategy & Development, 6(2), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.228

A configural model of analytics capabilities, ambidexterity, co‐opetition, and firm performance in the supply chain context

You May Also Like