journal article Apr 27, 2016

Ethanol production from rice hull using Pichia stipitis and optimization of acid pretreatment and detoxification processes

Biotechnology Progress Vol. 32 No. 4 pp. 872-882 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/btpr.2275
Abstract
The goal of this study was to produce ethanol from rice hull hydrolysates (RHHs) using Pichia stipitis strains and to optimize dilute acid hydrolysis and detoxification processes by response surface methodology (RSM). The optimized conditions were found as 127.14°C, solid:liquid ratio of 1:10.44 (w/v), acid ratio of 2.52% (w/v), and hydrolysis time of 22.01 min. At these conditions, the fermentable sugar concentration was 21.87 g/L. Additionally, the nondetoxified RHH at optimized conditions contained 865.2 mg/L phenolics, 24.06 g/L fermentable sugar, no hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), 1.62 g/L acetate, 0.36 g/L lactate, 1.89 g/L glucose, and 13.49 g/L fructose + xylose. Furthermore, RHH was detoxified with various methods and the best procedures were found to be neutralization with CaO or charcoal treatment in terms of the reduction of inhibitory compounds as compared to nondetoxified RHH. After detoxification procedures, the content of hydrolysates consisted of 557.2 and 203.1 mg/L phenolics, 19.7 and 21.60 g/L fermentable sugar, no HMF, 0.98 and 1.39 g/L acetate, 0 and 0.04 g/L lactate, 1.13 and 1.03 g/L glucose, and 8.46 and 12.09 g/L fructose + xylose, respectively. Moreover, the base‐line mediums (control), and nondetoxified and detoxified hydrolysates were used to produce ethanol by using P. stipitis strains. The highest yields except that of base‐line mediums were achieved using neutralization (35.69 and 38.33% by P. stipitis ATCC 58784 and ATCC 58785, respectively) and charcoal (37.55% by P. stipitis ATCC 58785) detoxification methods. Results showed that the rice hull can be utilized as a good feedstock for ethanol production using P. stipitis. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 32:872–882, 2016
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
43
[4]
Martin C "Dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of agricultural and agro‐industrial residues for ethanol production" Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2007)
[9]
Anonymous http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E. Accessed on: 21.05.2015.2015.
[20]
Fast pyrolysis of biomass in free-fall reactor for hydrogen-rich gas

Shaoping Xu, Shuqin Liu, Chen Yang et al.

Fuel Processing Technology 10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.043
[21]
SluiterA HamesB HymanD PayneC RuizR ScarlataC SluiterJ TempletonD WolfeJ.Determination of total solids in biomass and total dissolved solids in liquid process samples.National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden CO NREL Technical Report No. NREL/TP‐510‐426212008.
[23]
Anonymous http://www.futecs.com/public/pdf/futecspdf/HPLCcolumns_transgenomic.pdf Accessed on: 27.05.2015.
[24]
Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar

G. L. Miller

Analytical Chemistry 10.1021/ac60147a030
[31]
Lu Q "Analysis on chemical and physical properties of bio‐oil pyrolyzed from rice husk" J Anal Appl Pyrolysis (2008) 10.1016/j.jaap.2008.03.003
[35]
Megawati H "Pseudohomogeneous kinetic of dilute‐acid hydrolysis of rice husk for ethanol production: effect of sugar degradation" Int J Eng Appl Sci (2010)
[37]
Amenaghawon N "Statistical optimisation of dilute acid pretreatment of corn stover using response surface methodology" J Environ (2013)
[41]
Detoxification of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate improves ethanol production by Candida shehatae NCIM 3501

Anuj Kumar Chandel, Rajeev Kumar Kapoor, Ajay Singh et al.

Bioresource Technology 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.047