journal article Open Access Sep 02, 2022

Complex, high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention types, trends, and in‐hospital outcomes among different age groups: An insight from a national registry

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/ccd.30366
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundComplex, high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (CHiP) is increasingly being undertaken in octogenarians. However, limited data exist on CHiP types, trends, and outcomes in the octogenarian.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study from a national registry dataset on CHiP undertaken in patients with stable angina in England and Wales (January 2006 and December 2017) according to three age groups (group 1 [G1]: < 65 years; group 2 [G2]: 65–79 years; and group 3 [G3]: ≥80 years).ResultsOf 424,290 elective PCI procedures, 138,831 (33.0%) were CHiP [G1: 46,832 (33.7%); G2: 59,544 (42.9%); G3: 32,455 (23.4%)]. Among CHiP types, chronic total occlusion (CTO) (49.2%), prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (30.4%), and severe vascular calcification (21.8%) were common in G1; prior CABG (42.9%), CTO (32.9%), and severe vascular calcifications (27%) were common in G2; prior CABG (15.8%), severe vascular calcification (15.5%), and chronic renal failure (11.1%) were common CHiP among the octogenarians. The older age groups had higher adjusted odds (aOR) for adverse outcomes [G2: mortality, aOR 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.3–2.3); major bleeding, aOR 1.3, 95% CI (1.1–1.5); MACCE, aOR 1.2, 95% CI (1.0–1.3); G3: mortality, aOR 2.6, 95%CI (1.9–3.6); major bleeding, aOR 1.4, 95% CI (1.1–1.7); MACCE, aOR 1.3, 95% CI (1.1–1.5)].ConclusionThere were significant differences in the types of CHiP cases undertaken and clinical outcomes across age groups.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
42
[9]
Rashid M "British Cardiovascular Intervention Society registry framework: a quality improvement initiative on behalf of the National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR)" Eur Heart J (2019)
[14]
Shoaib A "Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries vs saphenous vein grafts" J Invasive Cardiol (2020)
[18]
Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?

Melissa J. Azur, Elizabeth A. Stuart, Constantine Frangakis et al.

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Re... 10.1002/mpr.329
[20]
Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis.

S Greenland

American Journal of Public Health 10.2105/ajph.79.3.340
[26]
Levine GN "ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions" Circulation (2011)
[27]
Windecker S "ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio‐Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)" Eur Heart J (2014)
[36]
Brener SJ "A novel risk score to predict one‐year mortality in patients undergoing complex high‐risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP‐PCI)" J Invasive Cardiol (2021)