journal article Open Access Oct 11, 2022

Pharmacogenomic Testing and Depressive Symptom Remission: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective, Controlled Clinical Trials

Abstract
Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing has emerged as a compelling strategy that clinicians can use to inform antidepressant medication selection and dosing, but the clinical efficacy of this strategy has been questioned. We systematically reviewed and meta‐analyzed clinical trials for an association between the use of PGx‐guided antidepressant therapy and depressive symptom remission in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). We included prospective, controlled clinical trials published in English up to July 12, 2022. Data extraction and synthesis adhered to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. Each trial was assessed for risk of bias and a random‐effects model was used to estimate pooled risk ratios. Thirteen trials comprising 4,767 patients were analyzed, including 10 randomized controlled trials, and three open label trials. Across all included trials, those that received PGx‐guided antidepressant therapy (n = 2,395) were 1.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15–1.74, P = 0.001) more likely to achieve remission compared with those that received unguided antidepressant therapy (n = 2,372). Pooled risk ratios for randomized controlled trials and open label trials were 1.46 (95% CI: 1.13–1.88) and 1.26 (95% CI = 0.84–1.88), respectively. These results suggest that PGx‐guided antidepressant therapy is associated with a modest but significant increase in depressive symptom remission in adults with MDD. Efforts to address the heterogeneity in PGx test composition (i.e., genes and alleles tested) and accompanying prescribing recommendations across trials will likely reduce the uncertainty about the efficacy of PGx‐guided antidepressant therapy in the literature.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
38
[5]
FDA.Table of pharmacogenomic biomarkers in drug labeling.https://www.fda.gov/drugs/science‐and‐research‐drugs/table‐pharmacogenomic‐biomarkers‐drug‐labeling. Accessed April 27 2022.
[8]
Bousman C. "Review and consensus on pharmacogenomic testing in psychiatry" Pharmacopsychiatry (2020)
[16]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt et al.

BMJ 10.1136/bmj.n71
[18]
Collaboration TC.Review Manager (RevMan) V5.4. Cochrane Reviews;2022.
[19]
Project TJ.Jamovi.2022.https://www.jamovi.org
[21]
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider et al.

BMJ 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
[24]
Winner J.G. "A prospective, randomized, double‐blind study assessing the clinical impact of integrated pharmacogenomic testing for major depressive disorder" Discov. Med. (2013)
[38]
American Society of Pharmacovigilance.Standardizing Laboratory Practices in Pharmacogenomics.https://www.stopadr.org/stripe. Accessed April 29 2022.
Cited By
102
The Journal of Pharmacology and Exp...
Disease and Therapeutics
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Metrics
102
Citations
38
References
Details
Published
Oct 11, 2022
Vol/Issue
112(6)
Pages
1303-1317
License
View
Cite This Article
Lisa C. Brown, Joseph D. Stanton, Kanika Bharthi, et al. (2022). Pharmacogenomic Testing and Depressive Symptom Remission: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective, Controlled Clinical Trials. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 112(6), 1303-1317. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2748