journal article Oct 24, 2022

Spread the word: Certifying sustainable behaviour for territorial development. A stakeholder engagement approach to assess financial performance

Abstract
AbstractThe aim of the study is to understand the approach to certification from different perspectives, in order to appreciate how the stakeholders, enact processes of creation, implementation and decision‐making processes in establishing criteria for local development. We analysed the extant literature in order to assess the present knowledge and approach on the world of labelling for sustainable development and detect possible paths for future research in the field. A document search was conducted through Scopus and WoS databases. Sustainable certifications do not cover a univocal path of implementation, so it is made necessary to establish a network approach in order to involve all the stakeholders to boost new processes for implementation of bottom‐up strategies for sustainable development. The necessity to start a new approach to local development strategies recalls the opportunity of creating new local networks amongst different stakeholders to talk each other on a univocal perspective that looks with favour to sustainability issues and enhance the link to financial performance. The example of bio‐districts is carried on enforcing the theoretical aspects.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
66
[1]
AIAB. (2021).Biodistretti.https://aiab.it/biodistretti/
[7]
Blumenfeld K. (1990)
[8]
Bratt C.(2011).Assessment of eco‐labelling and green procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective. Blekinge Institute of Technology Licentiate Dissertation Series. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.012
[10]
Bratt C. Hallstedt S. Robèrt K. H. Broman G. &Oldmark J.(2011b).Eco‐labelling criteria development for strategic life cycle management. Proceedings of the Life Cycle Management Conference LCM.
[14]
Buckley R.(2001).Major issues in tourism ecolabelling. Tourism ecolabelling: Certification and promotion of sustainable management 19–26. 10.1079/9780851995069.0019
[15]
Tourism ecolabels

Ralf Buckley

Annals of Tourism Research 10.1016/s0160-7383(01)00035-4
[22]
Dikau S. &Volz U.(2018).Central banking climate change and green finance. 10.1007/978-981-13-0227-5_17
[23]
D'Souza C. "Ecolabel programmes: A stakeholder (consumer) perspective" Corporate Communications: An International Journal (2004)
[25]
Ecolabelindex(2021).Ecolabel index.com.
[26]
Elkington J.(1997a).Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century 73. 10.1002/tqem.3310080106
[27]
Elkington J. "The triple bottom line" Environmental Management: Readings and Cases (1997)
[30]
European Commission (2020)
[31]
European Commission(2020b).Regulation (Eu) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088.https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32020R0852.
[32]
European Commission (2021)
[42]
Karl H. "Economic aspects of environmental labelling" The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics (1999)

Showing 50 of 66 references

Metrics
4
Citations
66
References
Details
Published
Oct 24, 2022
Vol/Issue
30(3)
Pages
1096-1103
License
View
Cite This Article
Francesco Manta, Valeria Stefanelli, Vittorio Boscia (2022). Spread the word: Certifying sustainable behaviour for territorial development. A stakeholder engagement approach to assess financial performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1096-1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2406