journal article Jan 07, 2025

Addressing Sustainability Footprint Disclosure for High Pollutant Firms in China and the US: The Roles of Firms Governance Structure, Financing Decisions, and Eco‐Technology

Abstract
ABSTRACTIn a race toward a sustainable future, corporate actions speak louder than words but what drives firms to reveal their true environmental impact? This study uncovers how governance structures and financing decisions shape sustainability footprint disclosure (SFD) among high‐pollutant manufacturing firms in China and the US while exploring the pivotal role of eco‐technology in magnifying these effects. Drawing on agency and resource‐based theories, we dissect governance into structural, diversity, and process attributes, analyzing data from 149 Chinese firms and 158 US firms from 2000 to 2022. We found robust evidence that, regarding the structural attributes board size and CEO duality positively influence SFD, whilst board independence negatively impacts on SFD. Moreover, the diversity attributes such as age diversity and gender diversity recorded a positive link with SFD whilst foreign nationals recorded a negative link with SFD. In addition, process attributes such as board meetings recorded a positive link with SFD whilst board tenure recorded a negative link with SFD. Financing decisions such as debt financing and equity finance are positively linked to SFD. Notably, eco‐technology strengthens the relationship between governance, financing, and SFD. These findings highlight the vital role of corporate boards in shaping sustainability outcomes, offering key insights for policymakers to foster innovation and implement stringent environmental regulations that enhance governance and transparency.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
52
[6]
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage

Jay Barney

Journal of Management 10.1177/014920639101700108
[9]
Bruner C. M. "Corporate Governance Reform and the Sustainability Imperative" Yale Law Journal (2021)
[12]
Unit root tests for panel data

In Choi

Journal of International Money and Finance 10.1016/s0261-5606(00)00048-6
[15]
Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root

David A. Dickey, Wayne A. Fuller

Journal of the American Statistical Association 10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
[25]
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels

Kyung So Im, M.Hashem Pesaran, Yongcheol Shin

Journal of Econometrics 10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7
[26]
Jensen M. C. (2019)
[27]
Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties

Andrew Levin, Chien-Fu Lin, Chia-Shang James Chu

Journal of Econometrics 10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00098-7
[29]
Worldwide evidence of corporate governance influence on ESG disclosure in the utilities sector

Giuseppe Nicolò, Giovanni Zampone, Giuseppe Sannino et al.

Utilities Policy 10.1016/j.jup.2023.101549
[32]
Empirical study on the impact of working capital management on going concern of manufacturing firms in Ghana

Abednego Osei, Andrew Osei Agyemang, Joseph Owusu Amoah et al.

Cogent Business & Management 10.1080/23311975.2023.2218177
[35]
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence

M. Hashem Pesaran

Journal of Applied Econometrics 10.1002/jae.951
[48]
The Moderating Role of Ownership Concentration on Financing Decisions and Firm’s Sustainability: Evidence from China

Kankan Wen, Andrew Osei Agyemang, Noha Alessa et al.

Sustainability 10.3390/su151813385
[49]
An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports

Joanne Wiseman

Accounting, Organizations and Society 10.1016/0361-3682(82)90025-3

Showing 50 of 52 references

Metrics
61
Citations
52
References
Details
Published
Jan 07, 2025
Vol/Issue
32(2)
Pages
2835-2858
License
View
Cite This Article
Andrew Osei Agyemang, Kong Yusheng, Abednego Osei (2025). Addressing Sustainability Footprint Disclosure for High Pollutant Firms in China and the US: The Roles of Firms Governance Structure, Financing Decisions, and Eco‐Technology. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(2), 2835-2858. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3092