journal article Open Access Mar 01, 2020

Surgical trauma‐induced immunosuppression in cancer: Recent advances and the potential therapies

Abstract
AbstractSurgical resection remains the mainstay treatment for solid cancers, especially for localized disease. However, the postoperative immunosuppression provides a window for cancer cell proliferation and awakening dormant cancer cells, leading to rapid recurrences or metastases. This immunosuppressive status after surgery is associated with the severity of surgical trauma since immunosuppression induced by minimally invasive surgery is less than that of an extensive open surgery. The systemic response to tissue damages caused by surgical operations and the subsequent wound healing induced a cascade alteration in cellular immunity. After surgery, patients have a high level of circulating damage‐associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), triggering a local and systemic inflammation. The inflammatory metrics in the immediate postoperative period was associated with the prognosis of cancer patients. Neutrophils provide the first response to surgical trauma, and the production of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) promotes cancer progression. Activated macrophage during wound healing presents a tumor‐associated phenotype that cancers can exploit for their survival advantage. In addition, the amplification and activation of myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), regulatory T cells (Tregs) or the elevated programmed death ligand‐1 and vascular endothelial growth factor expression under surgical trauma, exacerbate the immunosuppression and favor of the formation of the premetastatic niche. Therapeutic strategies to reduce the cellular immunity impairment after surgery include anti‐DAMPs, anti‐postoperative inflammation or inflammatory/pyroptosis signal, combined immunotherapy with surgery, antiangiogenesis and targeted therapies for neutrophils, macrophages, MDSCs, and Tregs. Further, the application of enhanced recovery after surgery also has a feasible outcome for postoperative immunity restoration. Overall, current therapies to improve the cellular immunity under the special condition after surgery are relatively lacking. Further understanding the underlying mechanisms of surgical trauma‐related immunity dysfunction, phenotyping the immunosuppressive cells, and developing the related therapeutic intervention should be explored.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
216
[2]
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial

Joel Shapiro, J Jan B van Lanschot, Maarten C C M Hulshof et al.

The Lancet Oncology 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00040-6
[5]
Surgery for Cancer: A Trigger for Metastases

Samer Tohme, Richard L Simmons, Allan Tsung

Cancer Research 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-1536
[7]
Krall JA "The systemic response to surgery triggers the outgrowth of distant immune‐controlled tumors in mouse models of dormancy" Sci Transl Med (2018) 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan3464
[10]
Porta C "Immunological stress in kidney cancer patients undergoing either open nephrectomy or nephron‐sparing surgery: an immunophenotypic study of lymphocyte subpopulations and circulating dendritic cells" Oncol Rep (2008)
[14]
Coosemans A "Immunosuppressive parameters in serum of ovarian cancer patients change during the disease course" Oncoimmunology (2015) 10.1080/2162402x.2015.1111505
[16]
Kaya M "Concomitant tumour resistance in patients with osteosarcoma. A clue to a new therapeutic strategy" J Bone Joint Surg Br (2004) 10.1302/0301-620x.86b1.14069
[17]
Zheng C "Minimally invasive video‐assisted versus conventional open thyroidectomy on immune response: a meta analysis" Int J Clin Exp Med (2015)
[23]
Dedej T "Alterations in homeostasis after open surgery. A prospective randomized study" G Chir (2013)
[28]
Lefrançais E "Mechanisms of IL‐33 processing and secretion: differences and similarities between IL‐1 family members" Eur Cytokine Netw (2012) 10.1684/ecn.2012.0320
[40]
Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome

Fabio Martinon, Virginie Pétrilli, Annick Mayor et al.

Nature 10.1038/nature04516
[41]
Damage-associated molecular patterns and their role as initiators of inflammatory and auto-immune signals in systemic lupus erythematosus

Karen Álvarez, Gloria Vasquez

International Reviews of Immunology 10.1080/08830185.2017.1365146
[43]
Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury

Qin Zhang, Mustafa Raoof, Yu Chen et al.

Nature 10.1038/nature08780

Showing 50 of 216 references

Related

You May Also Like

Single‐cell RNA sequencing technologies and applications: A brief overview

Dragomirka Jovic, Xue Liang · 2022

1,083 citations

Cancer nanomedicine: a review of recent success in drug delivery

Stephanie Tran, Peter‐Joseph DeGiovanni · 2017

828 citations

EMT and tumor metastasis

Sarah Heerboth, Genevieve Housman · 2015

612 citations

Anti‐inflammatory hydrogel dressings and skin wound healing

Chun-Yuh Huang, Lanlan Dong · 2022

372 citations