journal article Open Access Nov 03, 2011

Body mass explains characteristic scales of habitat selection in terrestrial mammals

Ecology and Evolution Vol. 1 No. 4 pp. 517-528 · Wiley
Abstract
AbstractNiche theory in its various forms is based on those environmental factors that permit species persistence, but less work has focused on defining the extent, or size, of a species’ environment: the area that explains a species’ presence at a point in space. We proposed that this habitat extent is identifiable from a characteristic scale of habitat selection, the spatial scale at which habitat best explains species’ occurrence. We hypothesized that this scale is predicted by body size. We tested this hypothesis on 12 sympatric terrestrial mammal species in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. For each species, habitat models varied across the 20 spatial scales tested. For six species, we found a characteristic scale; this scale was explained by species’ body mass in a quadratic relationship. Habitat measured at large scales best‐predicted habitat selection in both large and small species, and small scales predict habitat extent in medium‐sized species. The relationship between body size and habitat selection scale implies evolutionary adaptation to landscape heterogeneity as the driver of scale‐dependent habitat selection.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
41
[1]
Allen T. F. H. (1992)
[4]
Burnham K. P. (2002)
[18]
Habitat selection at multiple scales

Stephen J. Mayor, David C. Schneider, James A. Schaefer et al.

Écoscience 10.2980/16-2-3238
[27]
O’Connell A. F. (2010)
[30]
RDevelopment Core Team.2010.R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna Austria :R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Metrics
100
Citations
41
References
Details
Published
Nov 03, 2011
Vol/Issue
1(4)
Pages
517-528
License
View
Cite This Article
Jason T. Fisher, Brad Anholt, John P. Volpe (2011). Body mass explains characteristic scales of habitat selection in terrestrial mammals. Ecology and Evolution, 1(4), 517-528. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.45