Abstract
ABSTRACT

Nest survival is a key determinant of birds' breeding success, particularly in ground‐breeding birds, where nest predation is a major cause of reproductive failure. Birds can maximise their nesting success by optimising aspects of the sociospatial environment of a nest, for example, by reducing the risk of predation or flooding. Previous research showed that ruff (
Calidris pugnax
) females nest closer to leks and to nests of conspecifics, and in some years, further from the shoreline and from meadow edges than expected by chance. However, whether and how social and environmental factors affect nest survival remains unclear. To fill this gap in knowledge, we analysed daily nest survival in a breeding population of ruffs, using nest locations from six breeding seasons. Following a Bayesian approach, we estimated daily nest survival rates to assess the impacts of social, spatial and temporal factors on ruff nest survival in three models focusing on distinct sources of mortality: (i) all sources of mortality (
Overall
model), (ii) all sources of mortality except for predation (
No‐predation
model) and (iii) only predation (
Predation
model). We also studied the effects of an intervention to protect nests at increased risk of failure by replacing their eggs with plastic dummies and artificially incubating the collected clutches. Overall, younger nests and those at intermediate distances to other nests had the highest daily nest survival, whereas laying date and distance to paths had a negative effect on daily nest survival in the
No‐predation
model. The use of dummy eggs reduced nest mortality of protected nests at strong risk of failure from flooding and cattle trampling, as well as the impact of predation. We highlight that identifying the sources of nest mortality is necessary to inform species and habitat management, ameliorate productivity and improve the recovery of endangered wader populations.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
105
[1]
Algora H. V.‐M.Pakanen C.Küpper andK.Koivula.2024.“Social and Environmental Correlates of Nest Predation in Ruffs.”https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KPFXG.
[3]
Andersen F. S. "Contributions to the Biology of the Ruff (Philomachus pugnax (L.)) II" Dansk Ornitologisk Forening Tidsskrift (1948)
[4]
Andrén H. (1995) 10.1007/978-94-011-0717-4_10
[11]
General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations

Stephen P. Brooks, Andrew Gelman

Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787
[24]
Gochfeld M. (1984) 10.1007/978-1-4684-4691-3_8
[28]
Gregow H. M.Rantanen T. K.Laurila andA.Mäkelä.2020.“Review on Winds Extratropical Cyclones and Their Impacts in Northern Europe and Finland.”Finnish Meteorological Institute. 10.35614/isbn.9789523361188
[32]
Hildén O. "Habitat Selection in Birds: A Review" Annales Zoologici Fennici (1965)
[33]
Höglund J. (1995) 10.1515/9781400864157
[34]
Huhta E. (2015)
[40]
Korner‐Nievergelt F. (2015)

Showing 50 of 105 references

Metrics
0
Citations
105
References
Details
Published
Mar 31, 2026
Vol/Issue
16(4)
License
View
Funding
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Tutkijakoulu, Oulun Yliopiston
Ympäristöministeriö Award: VN24452/2020
Cite This Article
Hanna Algora, Krisztina Kupán, Jelena Belojević, et al. (2026). Nest Survival and Failure in Ruffs Breeding on Grazed Coastal Meadows. Ecology and Evolution, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73166