journal article Open Access Mar 31, 2026

Bite‐ DNA Shows Substantial Browsing on Willows ( Salix spp.) by North American Bison in Yellowstone National Park

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/ece3.73354
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Riparian willows (
Salix
spp.) in Yellowstone National Park have long been shaped by ungulate browsing, yet the specific contribution of individual herbivore species remains unclear. We applied a bite‐DNA metabarcoding approach, extracting saliva DNA from browsed willow twigs, to directly identify the browsing community across six northern range riparian sites. Mammalian DNA was successfully assigned for more than half of the collected bite samples, revealing browsing by moose (

Alces alces

), North American bison (

Bison bison

), elk (

Cervus canadensis

), deer (
Odocoileus
sp.), bighorn sheep (

Ovis canadensis

), and jackrabbit (

Lepus townsendii

). Contrary to the traditional view of bison as primarily grazers, bite‐DNA showed that bison were the most frequent browsers of willows, present at all sites and contributing the majority of browsing bites. Elk, historically considered the primary browser on riparian shrubs, were detected less often, whereas mule deer browsing was consistently recorded and frequently exceeded elk. Browsing height largely overlapped among species and was significantly higher for bighorn sheep than for bison and mule deer. Diameter of browsed twigs did not differ significantly between species. Browsing composition varied locally without clear spatial patterns, suggesting that site‐level factors shape where different ungulates browse willows. Our results demonstrate substantial bison browsing on riparian willows and highlight shifting herbivore impacts on Yellowstone's riparian ecosystems.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
56
[3]
Bartoń K.2010.“MuMIn: Multi‐Model Inference.”https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.MuMIn. 10.32614/cran.package.mumin
[4]
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

Douglas Bates, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker et al.

Journal of Statistical Software 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
[6]
Riparian vegetation recovery in Yellowstone: The first two decades after wolf reintroduction

Robert L. Beschta, William J. Ripple

Biological Conservation 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.031
[9]
DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data

Benjamin J Callahan, Paul J McMurdie, Michael J Rosen et al.

Nature Methods 10.1038/nmeth.3869
[10]
Chadde S. W. (1991)
[14]
Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data?

Bruce E. Deagle, Austen C. Thomas, Julie C. McInnes et al.

Molecular Ecology 10.1111/mec.14734
[16]
Despain D. G. (1986)
[18]
Hamlin K. L. (2008)
[19]
Hartig F.2024.“DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi‐Level / Mixed) Regression Models.”R Package Version 0.4.7.https://CRAN.R‐project.org/package=DHARMa.
[22]
Hollister J. W. A. L.Robitaille M. W.Beck M.Johnson‐NOAA T.Shah andJ.Nowosad.2023.“jhollist/elevatr: CRAN Release v0.99.0.”https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8335450.
[23]
Houston D. B. (1982)
[31]
Lenth R. V.2017.“emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means aka Least‐Squares Means.”https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.emmeans. 10.32614/cran.package.emmeans
[35]
Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads

Marcel Martin

EMBnet.journal 10.14806/ej.17.1.200
[36]
Database indexing for production MegaBLAST searches

Aleksandr Morgulis, George Coulouris, Yan Raytselis et al.

Bioinformatics 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn322
[38]
National Research Council (2002)
[48]
R Core Team.2024.“R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.”
[50]
Ruth T. K. (2019) 10.5876/9781607328292

Showing 50 of 56 references

Metrics
0
Citations
56
References
Details
Published
Mar 31, 2026
Vol/Issue
16(4)
License
View
Funding
Skogssällskapet
Cite This Article
Julia L. Jansson, Robert Spitzer, Jaelle Caitlin Brealey, et al. (2026). Bite‐ DNA Shows Substantial Browsing on Willows ( Salix spp.) by North American Bison in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology and Evolution, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73354