journal article Open Access May 07, 2021

Population dynamics of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) at summer roosts: Apparent survival, fidelity, abundance, and the influence of winter conditions

Ecology and Evolution Vol. 11 No. 12 pp. 7427-7438 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/ece3.7573
Abstract
Abstract


White‐nose syndrome (WNS) has caused the death of millions of bats, but the impacts have been more difficult to identify in western North America. Understanding how WNS, or other threats, impacts western bats may require monitoring other roosts, such as maternity roosts and night roosts, where bats aggregate in large numbers.

Little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) are experiencing some of the greatest declines from WNS. Estimating survival and understanding population dynamics can provide valuable data for assessing population declines and informing conservation efforts.

We conducted a 5‐year mark–recapture study of two M. lucifugus roosts in Colorado. We used the robust design model to estimate apparent survival, fidelity, and abundance to understand population dynamics, and environmental covariates to understand how summer and winter weather conditions impact adult female survival. We compared the fidelity and capture probability of M. lucifugus between colonies to understand how bats use such roosts.

Overwinter survival increased with the number of days with temperatures below freezing (β > 0.100, SE = 0.003) and decreased with the number of days with snow cover (β < −0.40, SE < 0.13). Adult female fidelity was higher at one maternity roost than the other. Overwinter and oversummer adult female survival was high (>0.90), and based on survival estimates and fungal‐swabbing results, we believe these populations have yet to experience WNS.

Recapture of M. lucifugus using antennas that continuously read passive integrated transponder tags allows rigorous estimation of bat population parameters that can elucidate trends in abundance and changes in survival. Monitoring populations at summer roosts can provide unique population ecology data that monitoring hibernacula alone may not. Because few adult males are captured at maternity colonies, and juvenile males have low fidelity, additional effort should focus on understanding male M. lucifugus population dynamics.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
66
[7]
Brunet‐Rossinni A. K. (2009)
[8]
Burnham K. P. (2002)
[23]
Humphrey S. R. "Population ecology of the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus, in Indiana and north‐central Kentucky" Special Publication of the American Society of Mammalogists (1976)
[28]
Kendall W. L. (2001)
[30]
Kunz T. H. (2010)
[31]
Kunz T. H. (2003)
[33]
Loeb S. C. Rodhouse T. J. Ellison L. E. Lausen C. L. Reichard J. D. Irvine K. M. Johnson D. M.(2015).A plan for the North American Bat Monitoring Program (NABat). United States Forest Service General Technical Report SRS‐208.United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station. 10.2737/srs-gtr-208
[37]
Mills L. S. (2007)
[42]
O'Driscoll P. Verant M. Mackay R. Hibbard C. &Abernathy I.(2018).Fungus that causes white‐nose syndrome in bats detected in Wyoming for the first time. Multiagency news release from National Park Service Wyoming Game and Fish Department U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and University of Wyoming.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Retrieved fromhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4493816‐FOLA‐Pd‐Fungus‐WY‐NPS‐FWS‐Release‐FINAL‐06‐01‐2018.html
[44]
O'Shea T. J. "Monitoring trends in bat populations of the United States and Territories: Status of the science and recommendations for the future" Wildlife Society Bulletin (2003)
[45]
O'Shea T. J. (2004)

Showing 50 of 66 references

Metrics
13
Citations
66
References
Details
Published
May 07, 2021
Vol/Issue
11(12)
Pages
7427-7438
License
View
Funding
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
Cite This Article
Robert A. Schorr, Jeremy L. Siemers (2021). Population dynamics of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) at summer roosts: Apparent survival, fidelity, abundance, and the influence of winter conditions. Ecology and Evolution, 11(12), 7427-7438. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7573