journal article Open Access Feb 18, 2026

Institutionalizing Advisory Bodies in Climate Governance: Between Transparency, Accountability and Efficiency

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/eet.70052
Abstract
ABSTRACT

The implementation of effective climate governance increasingly relies on advisory bodies that monitor the effectiveness of policies and management mechanisms. Despite their strategic importance to institutionalizing climate governance, limited attention has been paid to the roles, trajectories, and effectiveness of these advisory bodies within evolving governance systems. This study aims to better understand the challenges of institutionalizing advisory boards in climate governance and examines the factors that may influence the evolution of the governance model. This article examines the institutionalization of climate advisory bodies within Quebec's climate governance between 2012 and 2023. This in‐depth case study is based on analyses of interviews (
N
 = 31), briefs submitted during public hearings (
N
 = 90), and press articles (
N
 = 122). The study identified three main phases in the evolution of the governance structure and highlighted recurring and evolving issues related to the transparency and effectiveness of management processes. Drawing on the literature on institutional entrepreneurship and the life cycles of public organizations, the study shows how recurring tensions over mandates, resources, legitimacy, and performance monitoring have constrained advisory bodies' ability to support effective climate decision‐making. Despite repeated reforms, problems of transparency, accountability, and organizational effectiveness have persisted in various forms. This article contributes to research on climate governance by offering a process‐oriented analysis of advisory bodies as organizational actors embedded in complex institutional environments. This study highlights the limitations of frequent reforms aimed at integrating advisory organizations into climate governance systems.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
72
[3]
Member Checking

Linda Birt, Suzanne Scott, Debbie Cavers et al.

Qualitative Health Research 10.1177/1049732316654870
[6]
Commissaire au développement durable.2012.Rapport du Commissaire au Développement Durable.
[7]
Commissaire au développement durable.2014.Rapport du Commissaire au Développement Durable.
[8]
Commissaire au développement durable.2019.Rapport du Commissaire au Développement Durable.
[9]
Commissaire au développement durable.2020.Rapport du Commissaire au Développement Durable.
[10]
Commissaire au développement durable.2022.Rapport du Commissaire au Développement Durable.
[11]
Conseil de gestion du Fonds vert.2018.Recommandations sur les Ajustements Budgétaires à Apporter au Plan d'action 2013–2020 sur les Changements Climatiques.
[12]
Conseil de gestion du Fonds v.2018.Avis du Conseil de Gestion du Fonds Vert Portant sur le Bilan mi‐parcours du Plan d'action 2013–2020 sur les Changements Climatiques.
[16]
Dudley H. (2021)
[18]
Dunleavy P. (2010)
[19]
Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit.2024.“Net Zero Scoreboard.”https://eciu.net/netzerotracker.
[20]
Evans N. (2021)
[22]
Gouvernement du Québec.2017.Act Respecting the Ministère du Développement Durable de l'Environnement et des Parcs.
[23]
Gouvernement du Québec.2021.Auditot General Act.
[26]
The Population Ecology of Organizations

Michael T. Hannan, John Freeman

American Journal of Sociology 10.1086/226424
[29]
IPCC.2023.Summary for Policymakers.
[30]
Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects

Andrew J. Jordan, Dave Huitema, Mikael Hildén et al.

Nature Climate Change 10.1038/nclimate2725
[31]
Jörgensen K. (2015)
[38]
Langley A. (2009)
[39]
Lecavallier C. "L'argent du Fonds Vert Gaspillé" Journal de Québec (2016)
[44]
MDDELCC.2014.Plans d'action sur les Changements Climatiques: Bilan 2012–2013.
[45]
MDDELCC.2016.Le Gouvernement du Québec Annonce des Modifications Importantes à la Gouvernance du Fonds Vert.
[46]
Mddelcc.2017.Bilan mi‐parcours du Plan d'action 2013–2020 sur les Changements Climatiques.
[47]
Mddelcc.2018.Strengths and Advantages of Québec's Cap‐and‐Trade System.
[48]
MELCCFP.2020.Adoption du projet de loi 44: Une Gouvernance Efficace et Responsable Pour Répondre à l'urgenceclimatique et Créer de la Richesse.
[49]
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony

John W. Meyer, Brian Rowan

American Journal of Sociology 10.1086/226550
[50]
Miljand M. (2021)

Showing 50 of 72 references

Metrics
0
Citations
72
References
Details
Published
Feb 18, 2026
Vol/Issue
36(2)
Pages
330-342
License
View
Funding
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Award: 430‐2020‐00725
Cite This Article
David Talbot, Luc Bernier (2026). Institutionalizing Advisory Bodies in Climate Governance: Between Transparency, Accountability and Efficiency. Environmental Policy and Governance, 36(2), 330-342. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70052