Comparison of high‐intensity interval training and moderate‐intensity continuous training on cardiopulmonary function, cardiac autonomic function and vascular function in adolescent boys with obesity: A randomized controlled trial

Zheng‐yu Su; Wei‐liang Yu; Zhi‐wei Yan; Duo‐duo Ding; Chang‐chang Fang; Qing‐lu Luo; Xiao Liu; Lian‐Zhong Cao

doi:10.1002/ejsc.12207

journal article Open Access Nov 05, 2024

Comparison of high‐intensity interval training and moderate‐intensity continuous training on cardiopulmonary function, cardiac autonomic function and vascular function in adolescent boys with obesity: A randomized controlled trial

Zheng‐yu Su Wei‐liang Yu Zhi‐wei Yan Duo‐duo Ding Chang‐chang Fang Qing‐lu Luo Xiao Liu

Lian‐Zhong Cao

European Journal of Sport Science Vol. 24 No. 12 pp. 1871-1882 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/ejsc.12207

Abstract

AbstractAdolescent obesity can impair cardiopulmonary function, vascular elasticity, endothelial function, and vago‐sympathetic balance. While moderate‐intensity continuous training (MICT) benefits cardiovascular health in obese adolescents, the effects of high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) are less understood. We hypothesize that HIIT may be more effective than MICT in improving VO2peak, vascular elasticity, endothelial function, and vago‐sympathetic balance in obese adolescent boys. Forty four participants were randomly assigned to the HIIT (10 × 1‐min at 85%–95% peak HR, intersperse with 2‐min active recovery at 60%–70% peak HR) or MICT (35 min at 65%–75% peak HR) for an 8‐week program. The primary outcome measured was the change in VO2peak with secondary outcomes including brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), flow‐mediated dilation (FMD), and heart rate variability (HRV). Forty four adolescent boys with obesity (age, 14 ± 1 years old, body mass index, 31.6 ± 1.3 kg/m2) were enrolled and 43 (97.73%) completed the 8‐week exercise. No significant difference of VO2peak was found between the HIIT and MICT group (p = 0.243). There was no significant difference of baPWV between the groups (p = 0.789). Change in FMD% was significantly higher in the HIIT group compared to the MICT group (p < 0.001). The Change in HRV‐high frequency (HRV‐HF; p = 0.009) and HRV‐low frequency/high frequency (HRV‐LF/HF; p = 0.035) was significantly higher in the HIIT group compared to the MICT group. Among adolescent boys with obesity, 8‐week HIIT and MICT had similar effects on improving VO2peak. HIIT may be superior to MICT to improve endothelial function and vago‐sympathetic balance.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

53

[1]

10.1177/2047487320924912

[2]

10.1139/apnm‐2015‐0413

[3]

ATS/ACCP Statement on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

American Review of Respiratory Disease 10.1164/rccm.167.2.211

[4]

10.1016/j.numecd.2022.06.009

[5]

10.3390/ijerph182211905

[6]

10.1037/hea0000390

[7]

10.1089/chi.2017.0024

[8]

10.1210/jc.2013‐4211

[9]

10.1371/journal.pone.0057454

[10]

10.1007/s00246‐013‐0838‐6

[11]

10.1038/s41440‐020‐0477‐2

[12]

10.1080/17461391.2021.1900403

[13]

10.3390/ijerph182111065

[14]

10.1016/j.numecd.2021.09.024

[15]

10.31211/rpics.2018.4.1.72

[16]

10.3760/cma.j.cn112338‐20220402‐00253

[17]

10.1371/journal.pone.0138853

[18]

10.1590/0103‐0582201432210213

[19]

10.1113/ep087005

[20]

10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.150821

[21]

Comparison of the effects of high-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on inflammatory markers, cardiorespiratory fitness, and quality of life in breast cancer patients

Amin Isanejad, Somayeh Nazari, Behroz Gharib et al.

Journal of Sport and Health Science 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.07.001

[22]

10.1097/hcr.0000000000000049

[23]

10.1253/circj.cj‐14‐1154

[24]

10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

[25]

10.1139/y09‐041

[26]

10.1007/s40618‐016‐0551‐4

[27]

10.1161/circulationaha.111.038422

[28]

10.1111/pedi.12787

[29]

10.1038/s41371‐020‐0298‐4

[30]

10.3390/ijerph17082955

[31]

10.1038/oby.2009.59

[32]

10.1139/apnm‐2019‐0160

[33]

10.1055/a‐0577‐4280

[34]

10.1080/20469047.2019.1697568

[35]

10.1113/ep086767

[36]

10.1123/pes.2020‐0138

[37]

10.1007/s40846‐015‐0086‐8

[38]

10.5604/20831862.1198633

[39]

10.1007/s40279‐015‐0321‐z

[40]

10.1097/hjh.0000000000001200

[41]

10.1007/s00421‐020‐04301‐z

[42]

10.1007/s10286‐014‐0257‐7

[43]

10.1152/japplphysiol.00024.2016

[44]

10.3389/fphys.2022.966561

[45]

10.3389/fphys.2021.758299

[46]

10.1007/s11892‐018‐1062‐9

[47]

10.1016/j.pcad.2019.01.004

[48]

10.1093/eurheartj/ehad170

[49]

10.1038/nature05487

[50]

10.1159/000492457

Showing 50 of 53 references

Metrics

14

Citations

53

References

Details

Published: Nov 05, 2024
Vol/Issue: 24(12)
Pages: 1871-1882
License: View

Authors

Z

Zheng‐yu Su

College of Physical Education Liaoning Normal University Dalian Liaoning China

W

Wei‐liang Yu

The School of Clinical Medicine Fujian Medical University Fuzhou Fujian China

Z

Zhi‐wei Yan

Provincial University Key Laboratory of Sport and Health Science School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences Fujian Normal University Fuzhou Fujian China; College of Kinesiology Shenyang Sport University Shenyang Liaoning China

D

Duo‐duo Ding

The School of Clinical Medicine Fujian Medical University Fuzhou Fujian China

C

Chang‐chang Fang

Queen Mary College Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi China

Q

Qing‐lu Luo

Department of Rehabilitation The Tenth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University Dongguan People's Hospital Dongguan China; Dongguan Experimental Centre for Sports Rehabilitation Research Dongguan China; Dongguan Key Specialty of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Rehabilitation Department) Dongguan China

X

Xiao Liu

Department of Cardiology Sun Yat‐sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China; Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Guangzhou Guangdong China

L

Lian‐Zhong Cao

College of Physical Education Harbin Sport University Harbin Heilongjiang China

Cite This Article

Zheng‐yu Su, Wei‐liang Yu, Zhi‐wei Yan, et al. (2024). Comparison of high‐intensity interval training and moderate‐intensity continuous training on cardiopulmonary function, cardiac autonomic function and vascular function in adolescent boys with obesity: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Sport Science, 24(12), 1871-1882. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.12207

Comparison of high‐intensity interval training and moderate‐intensity continuous training on cardiopulmonary function, cardiac autonomic function and vascular function in adolescent boys with obesity: A randomized controlled trial

You May Also Like