journal article Open Access Apr 01, 2026

A Smartphone and Web‐Based Automated Platform for Segmenting Urinary Tract Infection Using a Deep Learning‐Based Approach

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/eng2.70720
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) affect millions of people annually, with early and accurate diagnosis being essential for effective treatment. Traditional diagnostic methods such as urine culture and dipstick testing are often slow, costly, and sometimes unreliable, particularly in low‐resource settings where access to advanced laboratory facilities is limited. This study presents a deep learning–powered urinary sediment analysis system designed to operate on both web and mobile platforms. At its core is a UNet++ multi‐class segmentation model trained to identify various sediment types, including background, rod, red blood cells/white blood cells, yeast, miscellaneous, single epithelial cell, small epithelial cell sheet, and large epithelial cell sheet. The model was trained for 50 epochs using the Adam optimizer with a learning rate of 0.001 and evaluated using the Dice coefficient, Intersection over Union, precision, recall, and area under the curve. The background class achieved the highest accuracy (Dice coefficient = 0.9963, Intersection over Union = 0.9926, area under the curve = 0.9587), while rare categories such as yeast (Dice coefficient = 0.0092) and miscellaneous (Dice coefficient = 0.0234) were more difficult to detect due to class imbalance and visual similarity. In experimental performance tests, the system processed complex samples in about 11 s and simpler ones in 1–2 s, instantly displaying results on the web or mobile interface. This integrated approach offers a faster, more consistent alternative to traditional methods, with the potential to improve access to automated urine sediment image analysis in resource‐constrained healthcare environments.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
63
[2]
Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options

Ana L. Flores-Mireles, Jennifer N. Walker, Michael Caparon et al.

Nature Reviews Microbiology 10.1038/nrmicro3432
[5]
Najeeb S. "Comparison of Urine Dipstick Test With Conventional Urine Culture in Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection" Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons—Pakistan: JCPSP (2015)
[7]
O'Neill J. (2016)
[12]
K.Taranta‐JanuszandK.Musiał Pediatric and Adolescent Nephrology Facing the Future Diagnostic Advances and Prognostic Biomarkers in Everyday Practice 2021 www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm. 10.3390/books978-3-0365-5974-2
[20]
Ghassemi M. "A Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Machine Learning for Health. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science Proceedings" AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science (2020)
[36]
Najeeb S. (2015)
[43]
Laosu‐Angkoon S. "The Sensitivity and Specificity of a Urine Leukocyte Esterase Dipstick Test for the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in the Outpatient Clinic of Rajavithi Hospital" Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand (2013)
[44]
Taneja N. (2010)

Showing 50 of 63 references

Metrics
0
Citations
63
References
Details
Published
Apr 01, 2026
Vol/Issue
8(4)
License
View
Cite This Article
Justice Williams Asare, Lukman Hamza, Pious Ackon, et al. (2026). A Smartphone and Web‐Based Automated Platform for Segmenting Urinary Tract Infection Using a Deep Learning‐Based Approach. Engineering Reports, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70720