Assessment of the impact of battery selection on the feasibility of hybrid renewable energy systems

Ravi Chaurasia; Sanjay Gairola; Yash Pal

doi:10.1002/est2.329

journal article Mar 11, 2022

Assessment of the impact of battery selection on the feasibility of hybrid renewable energy systems

Ravi Chaurasia

Sanjay Gairola Yash Pal

Energy Storage Vol. 4 No. 4 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/est2.329

Abstract

AbstractThis paper assesses the technical, economic, and environmental feasibility of photovoltaic (PV)/wind turbines (WT)/diesel generator (DG)/battery‐based hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) using lead acid (LA), lithium‐ion (LI), and iron Edison nickel‐iron (IE) battery technologies (BTs). The energy cost is optimized, and the obtained results are compared to select the best hybrid system. The LI battery employed in the PV/DG/battery system (206.43 kW PV, 50 kW DG, 53.04 kWh LI batteries, and 61.1 kW converter) performed comparatively much better, as levelized cost of energy (LCOE) was reduced by around 28% and 20%, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were reduced by 31% and 6% as compared to the LA and IE batteries employed in HRES, respectively. In addition, sensitivity analysis reveals that the capital cost of PV and the discount rate are more critical to determining the LCOE and renewable penetration. In contrast, the effect of the battery cost and inflation rate is relatively small. Finally, comparing the optimal resource configuration has confirmed that PV/DG/LI has significantly reduced LCOE (58% less than DG/LI) and GHG emissions (87% less than DG/LI).

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

48

[1]

10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120697

[2]

10.1016/j.energy.2020.118850

[3]

10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.026

[4]

10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.110

[5]

10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.057

[6]

10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.050

[7]

10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.058

[8]

10.1016/j.renene.2015.04.057

[9]

10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.105

[10]

10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.070

[11]

10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.046

[12]

10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.055

[13]

10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.014

[14]

10.1016/j.seta.2018.09.007

[15]

10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.024

[16]

10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.033

[17]

10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.257

[18]

10.1002/ese3.71

[19]

10.1016/j.egyr.2019.01.010

[20]

10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.107

[21]

10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.061

[22]

10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.049

[23]

10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.024

[24]

10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.086

[25]

10.1016/j.egyr.2016.06.001

[26]

10.1007/978‐3‐030‐48539‐9

[27]

10.1002/er.6549

[28]

10.1002/er.6389

[29]

10.1016/j.esr.2020.100607

[30]

10.1093/ijlct/ctab012

[31]

10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.318

[32]

10.1016/j.rser.2020.110158

[33]

10.1002/9781119555667.ch5

[34]

10.1016/j.energy.2019.116702

[35]

10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.033

[36]

10.1016/j.egyr.2016.11.001

[37]

10.1063/1.4934659

[38]

10.1016/j.est.2021.102965

[39]

10.1002/est2.283

[40]

10.3389/fenrg.2020.509052

[41]

10.1002/er.4285

[42]

10.4229/eupvsec20152015‐5bv.3.32

[43]

10.1080/15459624.2011.601710

[44]

10.1016/b978‐0‐12‐814645‐3.00006‐7

[45]

10.1002/0471755621.ch15

[46]

10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.078

[47]

HelwigA AhfockT.Long‐life nickel iron battery functionality/cost comparison for peak demand SWER network voltage support application. Paper presented at: 2013 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC);2013:1–6. doi:10.1109/AUPEC.2013.6725377 10.1109/aupec.2013.6725377

[48]

10.1007/s12667‐021‐00491‐3

Metrics

6

Citations

48

References

Details

Published: Mar 11, 2022
Vol/Issue: 4(4)
License: View

Authors

R

Ravi Chaurasia

SREE, National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra Haryana India

S

Sanjay Gairola

EED, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Engineering and Technology Pauri Uttarakhand India

Y

Yash Pal

SREE, National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra Haryana India

Cite This Article

Ravi Chaurasia, Sanjay Gairola, Yash Pal (2022). Assessment of the impact of battery selection on the feasibility of hybrid renewable energy systems. Energy Storage, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/est2.329

Assessment of the impact of battery selection on the feasibility of hybrid renewable energy systems

You May Also Like