journal article Apr 01, 2015

Defining and Operationalizing the Construct of Pragmatic Competence: Review and Recommendations

ETS Research Report Series Vol. 2015 No. 1 pp. 1-43 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/ets2.12053
Abstract
This review paper constitutes the first step within a larger research effort to develop an interactive pragmatics learning tool for second and foreign language (L2) learners and users of English. The tool will primarily endeavor to support pragmatics learning within the language use domain “workplace.” Given this superordinate objective, this paper is subdivided into 2 parts. In the first section, we provide a detailed overview of previous (empirical) research, theories, and frameworks of communicative competence to review the role of pragmatics as an essential component ofL2communicative language ability. A principled, systematic, and exhaustive literature search was conducted via key word searches, and the selected literature was categorized and coded usingNVivo10 software. Next, 12 distinct models of communicative language ability that contain components of pragmatic knowledge were identified and analyzed. The commonly identified constitutive components were then reconceptualized into a proposed construct of pragmatic competence. The challenges of operationalizing pragmatic competence in both instruction and assessment are discussed. The second part of the paper constitutes a domain analysis of pragmatics in the language use domain “workplace.” First, the literature is reviewed for communicative tasks and activities that feature prominently in different workplace settings across various English‐speaking countries. Then, we suggest and exemplify different model task types that can be employed in the context of learning and assessment materials that aim to foster pragmatic‐functional awareness in both English as a foreign language (EFL)/English as a second language (ESL) learners and first language (L1) speakers alike.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
133
[1]
Allott N. (2010)
[2]
Bachman L. F. (1990)
[5]
Bachman L. F. (1996)
[6]
Bachman L. F. (2010)
[9]
Bardovi‐Harlig K. (2003)
[11]
[14]
Canale M. (1983)
[16]
Candlin C. (2002)
[18]
Celce‐Murcia M. (2000)
[22]
Clyne M. (1994)
[25]
Crystal D. (1985)
[26]
Crystal D. (1997)
[27]
Dixon‐Woods M. Cavers D. Agarwal S. Annandale E. Arthur A. Harvey J. &Sutton A.(2006).Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. Retrieved fromhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471‐2288/6/35 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
[28]
Donna S. (2000)
[29]
Drew P. (1992)
[30]
Drew P. (1992)
[35]
Flinspach S. L.(2001).Interpretive synthesis: A methodology for reviewing qualitative case‐study research(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago Chicago IL.
[39]
Geluykens R. (1999)
[40]
Generoso A.(2013).How may I help you? Polite telephone skills for workplace communication pp. 1–37. Retrieved fromhttp://angelageneroso.myefolio.com/Uploads/Generoso_CAPSTONE‐final.pdf
[42]
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research

GENE V GLASS

Educational Researcher 10.3102/0013189x005010003
[43]
Grabowski K.(2009).Investigating the construct validity of a test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge in the context of speaking(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University New York NY.
[44]
Green G. M. (2004)
[45]
Grice H. P. "Utterer's meaning, sentence meaning, and word meaning" Foundations of Language (1968)
[46]
Utterer's Meaning and Intention

H. P. Grice

The Philosophical Review 10.2307/2184179
[48]
Grice H. P. (1989)
[50]
Gunnarsson B.‐L. (2009)

Showing 50 of 133 references

Metrics
42
Citations
133
References
Details
Published
Apr 01, 2015
Vol/Issue
2015(1)
Pages
1-43
License
View
Cite This Article
Veronika Timpe Laughlin, Jennifer Wain, Jonathan Schmidgall (2015). Defining and Operationalizing the Construct of Pragmatic Competence: Review and Recommendations. ETS Research Report Series, 2015(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12053