journal article Open Access Jun 01, 2024

Evaluation of futures frequency method: Approach and main results

New Directions for Evaluation Vol. 2024 No. 182 pp. 13-29 · Wiley
Abstract
AbstractThe evaluation reported in this article explores the impacts and adaptability of Futures Frequency, a workshop method for futures thinking. The method is intended to improve participants' abilities to imagine alternative futures and initiate actions toward preferred futures, thereby enhancing futures thinking and change‐making skills. The evaluation framework is rooted in the approach of developmental evaluation with the goal of identifying practices that support the dissemination of futures thinking in society. The evaluation framework comprises a multidimensional evaluation of impacts, participatory forums for joint evaluation and learning, and diverse quantitative and qualitative data. Findings reveal clear indications of Futures Frequency influencing individuals’ thought processes and inspiring varied courses of actions, particularly at the individual level. Participants showed improved futures thinking skills and a greater ability to question assumptions about the future. At the community level, improvements were seen in questioning the future prospects of organizations, and at the societal level there was evidence of greater involvement of different groups in debates about the future. The study underscores the value of stimulating conversations in Futures Frequency workshops and the difficulty of maintaining interest in futures thinking. Integrating the method with an organization's ongoing activities was suggested as a way to promote sustained engagement. As the study was mainly aimed at expert workshops, further research is needed on the suitability of the Futures Frequency method for different groups and its potential to support forward‐looking debate across social groups.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
35
[2]
APF (2022)
[5]
Editorial

Albert Bandura

American Journal of Health Promotion 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8
[6]
Bell W. (2003)
[11]
Denzin N. K. (2005)
[13]
Dufva M. Grabtchak A. Ikäheimo H.‐P. Lähdemäki‐Pekkinen J. &Poussa L.(2021).Vaikuta tulevaisuuteen—Haasta kuvittele ja toimi. Sitran selvityksiä 174. Retrieved fromhttps://media.sitra.fi/app/uploads/2021/01/vaikuta‐tulevaisuuteen.pdf
[14]
Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization

Yrjo Engestrom

Journal of Education and Work 10.1080/13639080020028747
[15]
Gardner A. L. (2019)
[18]
Groves R. M. (2009)
[19]
Halonen M. Hyytinen K. &Kurki S.(2022).Tulevaisuusajattelu kansalaistaidoksi. Tulevaisuustaajuus‐työpajamenetelmän arviointitutkimuksen tulokset. Sitran selvityksiä 221. Retrieved fromhttps://media.sitra.fi/app/uploads/2022/10/sitra_tulevaisussajattelu‐kansalaistaidoksi_final.pdf
[21]
Krippendorff K. (2004)
[24]
Mezirov J. (2000)
[25]
The five dimensions of Futures Consciousness

Sanna Ahvenharju, Matti Minkkinen, Fanny Lalot

Futures 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.010
[28]
Patton M. Q. (2011)
[30]
Poussa L. Lähdemäki‐Pekkinen J. Ikäheimo H.‐P. &Dufva M.(2021).Futures Frequency. Workshop facilitator's handbook—A workshop method for building alternative futures. Sitra studies 183. Retrieved fromhttps://media.sitra.fi/app/uploads/2021/03/futuresfrequencyengv2.pdf
[31]
Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis

René Rohrbeck, Menes Etingue Kum

Technological Forecasting and Social Change 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.013
[35]
Wiessner C. A. (2000)
Metrics
3
Citations
35
References
Details
Published
Jun 01, 2024
Vol/Issue
2024(182)
Pages
13-29
License
View
Cite This Article
Minna Halonen, Kirsi Hyytinen, Sofi Kurki (2024). Evaluation of futures frequency method: Approach and main results. New Directions for Evaluation, 2024(182), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20603