Integrating perspectives on ecology, conservation value, and policy of bee pollinator seed mixes

Uta Müller; Bethanne Bruninga‐Socolar; Julia Brokaw; Daniel P Cariveau; Neal M Williams

doi:10.1002/fee.2715

journal article Feb 06, 2024

Integrating perspectives on ecology, conservation value, and policy of bee pollinator seed mixes

Uta Müller Bethanne Bruninga‐Socolar Julia Brokaw Daniel P Cariveau Neal M Williams

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Vol. 22 No. 4 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/fee.2715

Abstract

Wildflower plantings are an effective tool for mitigating floral resource scarcity, a major factor contributing to global declines in pollinator populations. However, the configuration of seed mixes for such plantings can encompass two different conservation goals: namely, the enhancement of a regulating ecosystem service (pollination) or the promotion of diverse pollinator communities, including rare or threatened species. According to which goal is prioritized, seed mixes consequently require different designs and implementation approaches. Here, we review common elements of wildflower seed mixes for native bees and highlight differences in application between the two conservation goals. Our focus on bees stems from agreement among different world regions to their functional value as pollinators and concern about recent global declines in their populations. We link the ecology of seed mixes with current challenges in US and EU policies supporting seed mix implementation. Finally, we advocate not only for clarity in goal setting, which will promote tailored seed mix design and application, but also for a reimagination of seed mix policies to increase their effectiveness for pollinator conservation.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

69

[1]

The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis

Matthias Albrecht, David Kleijn, Neal M. Williams et al.

Ecology Letters 10.1111/ele.13576

[2]

10.1007/s10841-019-00125-1

[3]

10.1111/rec.12445

[4]

10.1016/j.baae.2014.10.001

[5]

10.1016/j.baae.2010.11.001

[6]

Interpreting variation to advance predictive restoration science

Lars A. Brudvig, Rebecca S. Barak, Jonathan T. Bauer et al.

The Journal of Applied Ecology 10.1111/1365-2664.12938

[7]

10.1186/s12898-018-0210-z

[8]

10.1042/etls20190073

[9]

Creating patches of native flowers facilitates crop pollination in large agricultural fields: mango as a case study

Luísa G. Carvalheiro, Colleen L. Seymour, Susan W. Nicolson et al.

The Journal of Applied Ecology 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02217.x

[10]

Case M. (2018)

[11]

10.1016/j.agee.2021.107648

[12]

Connor C. (2015)

[13]

CRS (Congressional Research Service) (2021)

[14]

A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

Matteo Dainese, Emily A. Martin, Marcelo A. Aizen et al.

Science Advances 10.1126/sciadv.aax0121

[15]

EC (European Commission) (2017)

[16]

10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.001

[17]

Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers

Dave Goulson, Elizabeth Nicholls, Cristina Botías et al.

Science 10.1126/science.1255957

[18]

10.1111/rec.12481

[19]

10.1111/1365-2664.12135

[20]

Sown wildflower strips for insect conservation: a review

Christine Haaland, RUSSELL E. NAISBIT, LOUIS‐FÉLIX BERSIER

Insect Conservation and Diversity 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00098.x

[21]

10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.026

[22]

10.1016/j.baae.2014.11.001

[23]

10.1016/bs.aecr.2020.11.002

[24]

Jackson L (2019)

[25]

10.3390/land6030057

[26]

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x

[27]

10.1111/2041-210x.13017

[28]

10.1038/ncomms8414

[29]

10.1016/j.agee.2013.07.001

[30]

10.1126/science.aau6020

[31]

10.1111/conl.12381

[32]

10.1111/1365-2664.13943

[33]

10.1111/1365-2664.13694

[34]

10.1016/bs.aecr.2021.10.005

[35]

10.1080/09640568.2014.891975

[36]

10.1890/14-1863.1

[37]

10.1111/gec3.12373

[38]

10.1016/j.agee.2021.107773

[39]

10.1111/rec.13013

[40]

10.3390/su13147820

[41]

NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) (2023)

[42]

10.1111/gcb.13117

[43]

10.1007/s10841-012-9532-x

[44]

10.1098/rspb.2020.0922

[45]

Robinson CJ (2000)

[46]

10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.01.012

[47]

10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.007

[48]

10.1111/1365-2664.12479

[49]

10.1016/j.cois.2015.11.002

[50]

State of Minnesota (2021)

Showing 50 of 69 references

Metrics

10

Citations

69

References

Details

Published: Feb 06, 2024
Vol/Issue: 22(4)
License: View

Authors

U

Uta Müller

Department of Entomology and Nematology University of California–Davis Davis CA

B

Bethanne Bruninga‐Socolar

Department of Entomology University of Minnesota St Paul MN

J

Julia Brokaw

Department of Entomology University of Minnesota St Paul MN

D

Daniel P Cariveau

Department of Entomology University of Minnesota St Paul MN

N

Neal M Williams

Department of Entomology and Nematology University of California–Davis Davis CA

Cite This Article

Uta Müller, Bethanne Bruninga‐Socolar, Julia Brokaw, et al. (2024). Integrating perspectives on ecology, conservation value, and policy of bee pollinator seed mixes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2715

Integrating perspectives on ecology, conservation value, and policy of bee pollinator seed mixes

You May Also Like