journal article Apr 01, 1995

Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review

Hydrological Processes Vol. 9 No. 3-4 pp. 251-290 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/hyp.3360090305
Abstract
AbstractA framework is provided for scaling and scale issues in hydrology. The first section gives some basic definitions. This is important as researchers do not seem to have agreed on the meaning of concepts such as scale or upscaling. ‘Process scale’, ‘observation scale’ and ‘modelling (working) scale’ require different definitions. The second section discusses heterogeneity and variability in catchments and touches on the implications of randomness and organization for scaling. The third section addresses the linkages across scales from a modelling point of view. It is argued that upscaling typically consists of two steps: distributing and aggregating. Conversely, downscaling involves disaggregation and singling out. Different approaches are discussed for linking state variables, parameters, inputs and conceptualizations across scales. This section also deals with distributed parameter models, which are one way of linking conceptualizations across scales. The fourth section addresses the linkages across scales from a more holistic perspective dealing with dimensional analysis and similarity concepts. The main difference to the modelling point of view is that dimensional analysis and similarity concepts deal with complex processes in a much simpler fashion. Examples of dimensional analysis, similarity analysis and functional normalization in catchment hydrology are given. This section also briefly discusses fractals, which are a popular tool for quantifying variability across scales. The fifth section focuses on one particular aspect of this holistic view, discussing stream network analysis. The paper concludes with identifying key issues and gives some directions for future research.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
316
[4]
Allen T. F. H. (1982)
[5]
Anderson M. G. (1988)
[6]
Anderson M. G. (1990)
[12]
Topographic Partition of Watersheds with Digital Elevation Models

Lawrence E. Band

Water Resources Research 10.1029/wr022i001p00015
[16]
BathurstJ. C.andCooley K. R.‘Use of the SHE hydrological modelling system to investigate basin response to snowmelt at Reynolds Creek Idaho’ J. Hydrol. in press.
[17]
Benecke P. (1992)
[18]
Bergström S. "Principles and confidence in hydrological modelling" Nordic Hydrol. (1991) 10.2166/nh.1991.0009
[19]
Kinematic subsurface stormflow

Keith Beven

Water Resources Research 10.1029/wr017i005p01419
[25]
Beven K. (1993)
[26]
Beven K. "SHE: towards a methodology for physically‐based distributed forecasting in hydrology" Proc. Oxford Symp., IAHS Publ. (1980)
[30]
Blöschl G. "Organisation and randomness in catchments and the verification of hydrologic models" EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union (1993)
[31]
Blöschl G. (1994)
[33]
Blöschl G. Gutknecht D. andGrayson R. B.‘On spatial organisation and randomness in hydrology’ Wat. Resour. Res. submitted.
[35]
Bridges E. M. (1982)
[38]
Canterford R. P. (1987)
[39]
Carlson A. B. (1986)
[41]
Chang H. H. "Mathematical model for erodible channels" J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE (1982) 10.1061/jyceaj.0005864
[44]
Chorley R. J. (1984)
[45]
Chow V. T. (1988)

Showing 50 of 316 references

Cited By
1,392
Water Conservation Science and Engi...
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Envir...
Water Resources Research
Progress in Oceanography
Water Resources Research
Journal of Hydrology
Advances in Meteorology
Water Resources Research
Cold Regions Science and Technology
Regionalisation of catchment model parameters

Ralf Merz, Günter Blöschl · 2004

Journal of Hydrology
Metrics
1,392
Citations
316
References
Details
Published
Apr 01, 1995
Vol/Issue
9(3-4)
Pages
251-290
License
View
Cite This Article
G. Blöschl, M. Sivapalan (1995). Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review. Hydrological Processes, 9(3-4), 251-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090305