journal article Open Access Nov 07, 2021

Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress during lockdown due to COVID‐19

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/ijop.12818
Abstract
Several governments have implemented strict measures to reduce the spread of COVID‐19, such as lockdown measures. However, these measures have brought negative consequences at an individual level by exacerbating the psychological distress caused by the pandemic. We evaluated the role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS) on the levels of anxiety and depression during the lockdown in a sample of 663 Spanish‐speaking adults, while controlling for variables related to social support, hobbies, seeking information related to COVID‐19, perceived risk of infection, time of assessment, number of deaths and contagions during the assessment and age. Using multiple regression analyses with a stepwise model selection procedure, 29% of the variance in anxiety and 38% of the variance of depression were found to be predicted by specific CERS. The impact of CERS on anxiety and depression was moderated by the sex of participants and the time of assessment, indicating that CERS did not have the same protective or harmful effects in all participants and situations. Based on our results, recommendations are provided for improving coping with stressful events where lockdown measures are taken.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
30
[4]
Buela‐Casal G. Guillén‐Riquelme A.&Seisdedos Cubero N.(2015).STAI Cuestionario de Anisedad Estado‐Rasgo Manual(9th ed.) TEA Ediciones.
[5]
Çivitci A. "The moderating role of positive and negative affect on the relationship between perceived social support and stress in college students" Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice (2015)
[6]
Dominguez S. "Invarianza factorial del Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionarie (CERQ) en universitarios limeños y cordobeses" Universitas Psychologica (2016)
[8]
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses

Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner et al.

Behavior Research Methods 10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
[11]
Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: A comparative study of five specific samples

Nadia Garnefski, Vivian Kraaij

Personality and Individual Differences 10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.009
[13]
[16]
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

Li‐tze Hu, Peter M. Bentler

Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary... 10.1080/10705519909540118
[19]
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.

Robert C. MacCallum, Michael W. Browne, Hazuki M. Sugawara

Psychological Methods 10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130
[26]
Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements

Italo Trizano-Hermosilla, Jesús M. Alvarado

Frontiers in Psychology 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769