journal article Dec 14, 2025

Adolescent Control Belief Profiles: Gender Differences and the Effects of Psychological Adjustment on Their Transformation

Journal of Adolescence Vol. 98 No. 3 pp. 767-779 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/jad.70089
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Introduction
Adolescents' beliefs about the relationship between personal abilities and effort exhibit complex and divergent patterns, with previous studies highlighting significant gender differences in these belief systems. However, the underlying structure of control beliefs (including ability and effort beliefs) remains poorly understood, as well as how distinct belief patterns are associated with psychological adjustment. To address this gap, this study investigates the configuration of adolescents' beliefs about ability and effort and examines their associations with adaptive outcomes.


Methods

In total, 10,205 Chinese adolescents (61% male;
M

age

 = 16.56 years, SD

age

 = 0.84) completed the ability and effort belief subscales of the Chinese version of the Control, Agency, and Means‐ends Interview (CAMI), along with the Subjective Health Complaints questionnaire and Satisfaction with Life Scale, assessing control beliefs, subjective health, and life satisfaction, respectively. Participants were assessed longitudinally at three time points (March–April 2017, 2018, and 2019) at 1‐year intervals.



Results
Latent profile analysis identified three control belief profiles among adolescents: moderate, above average, and high control. The high control group (characterized by strong ability and effort beliefs) showed optimal psychological adjustment. Longitudinal analyses revealed that baseline psychological adjustment significantly predicted upward transitions among profiles. Notably, male adolescents showed a greater representation of adaptive profiles and more upward transitions.


Conclusions
These results highlight the heterogeneity of control beliefs and the nuanced association between control beliefs and psychological adjustment. Findings suggest that school interventions should target effort‐ability belief integration, particularly for female adolescents.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
77
[4]
Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control

Albert Bandura, W. H. Freeman, Richard Lightsey

Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
[18]
Dong Q. andC. D.Lin.2011. “Standardized Tests in Children and Adolescent Mental Development in China.
[20]
Dweck C. S. (2006)
[23]
Eccles J. S. (1983)
[35]
An Introduction to Latent Class Growth Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling

Tony Jung, K. A. S. Wickrama

Social and Personality Psychology Compass 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
[41]
Lerner R. M. (2006)
[43]
Li J. andK. W.Fischer.2004. Thought and Affect in American and Chinese Learners' Beliefs About Learning. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 399–432).https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610515-24. 10.4324/9781410610515-24
[49]
Markus H. R. (2003)

Showing 50 of 77 references