journal article Oct 04, 2020

Sign effect in adolescents: Within‐subject comparison of delay discounting of hypothetical monetary gains and losses

Abstract
The purpose of this article is to contribute to the research on the sign effect, steeper discounting of gains compared to losses, by offering results from an experiment using a “double‐delay” procedure on adolescents. Twenty‐four 14‐year‐old schoolchildren completed a computer‐based test consisting of choices of Smaller–Sooner (SS) and Larger–Later (LL) hypothetical monetary gains and losses. Within‐subject comparison and analysis of the aggregated data were conducted. Current results were also examined in light of prior research with adult participants, and variations in behavioral patterns were identified. Although the sign effect appears to be more profound in adolescents compared to adults, the effect of immediacy persists regardless of the sign of the outcome, and zero discounting of losses is often the case, suggesting that the sign effect is driven largely by qualitative differences.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
34
[3]
Ainslie G. (1992)
[4]
Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: Similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude.

Forest Baker, Warren K. Bickel

Journal of Abnormal Psychology 10.1037/0021-843x.112.3.382
[6]
Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses

Sara J. Estle, Leonard Green, Joel Myerson et al.

Memory & Cognition 10.3758/bf03193437
[17]
Good or Bad, We Want it Now: Fixed‐cost Present Bias for Gains and Losses Explains Magnitude Asymmetries in Intertemporal Choice

David J. Hardisty, Kirstin C. Appelt, Elke U. Weber

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 10.1002/bdm.1771
[23]
Madden G. J. (2010) 10.1037/12069-000
[24]
Mazur J. E. (1987)
[29]
Individual Differences in Delay Discounting: Differences are Quantitative with Gains, but Qualitative with Losses

Joel Myerson, Ana A. Baumann, Leonard Green

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 10.1002/bdm.1947
[30]
AREA UNDER THE CURVE AS A MEASURE OF DISCOUNTING

Joel Myerson, Leonard Green, Missaka Warusawitharana

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235
[33]
Thaler R. H.(1981).Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. – 8(3 )201‐207.https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(81)90067‐7 10.1016/0165-1765(81)90067-7
Metrics
2
Citations
34
References
Details
Published
Oct 04, 2020
Vol/Issue
114(3)
Pages
326-336
License
View
Cite This Article
Elise Frølich Furrebøe (2020). Sign effect in adolescents: Within‐subject comparison of delay discounting of hypothetical monetary gains and losses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 114(3), 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.629
Related

You May Also Like

AREA UNDER THE CURVE AS A MEASURE OF DISCOUNTING

Joel Myerson, Leonard Green · 2001

1,155 citations

ECONOMIC CONCEPTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR

Steven R. Hursh · 1980

716 citations

DELAY DISCOUNTING: I'M A K, YOU'RE A K

Amy L. Odum · 2011

500 citations

THE ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIORAL MOMENTUM

John A. Nevin, Charlotte Mandell · 1983

321 citations