journal article Sep 14, 2009

Optimizing prevention of hospital‐acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE): Prospective validation of a VTE risk assessment model

Journal of Hospital Medicine Vol. 5 No. 1 pp. 10-18 · Wiley
Abstract
AbstractBACKGROUND:Hospital‐acquired (HA) venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common source of morbidity/mortality. Prophylactic measures are underutilized. Available risk assessment models/protocols are not prospectively validated.OBJECTIVES:Improve VTE prophylaxis, reduce HA VTE, and prospectively validate a VTE risk‐assessment model.DESIGN:Observational design.SETTING:Academic medical center.PATIENTS:Adult inpatients on medical/surgical services.INTERVENTIONS:A simple VTE risk assessment linked to a menu of preferred VTE prophylaxis methods, embedded in order sets. Education, audit/feedback, and concurrent identification of nonadherence.MEASUREMENTS:Randomly sampled inpatient audits determined the percent of patients with “adequate” VTE prevention. HA VTE cases were identified concurrently via digital imaging system. Interobserver agreement for VTE risk level and judgment of adequate prophylaxis were calculated from 150 random audits.RESULTS:Interobserver agreement with 5 observers was high (kappa score for VTE risk level = 0.81, and for judgment of “adequate” prophylaxis = 0.90). The percent of patients on adequate prophylaxis improved each of the 3 years (58%, 78%, and 93%; P < 0.001) and reached 98% in the last 6 months of 2007; 361 cases of HA VTE occurred over 3 years. Significant reductions for the risk of HA VTE (risk ratio [RR] = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.47‐0.79) and preventable HA VTE (RR = 0.14; 95% CI = 0.06‐0.31) occurred. We detected no increase in heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or prophylaxis‐related bleeding using administrative data/chart review.CONCLUSIONS:We prospectively validated a VTE risk‐assessment/prevention protocol by demonstrating ease of use, good interobserver agreement, and effectiveness. Improved VTE prophylaxis resulted in a substantial reduction in HA VTE. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2010;5:10–18. © 2010 Society of Hospital Medicine.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
28
[1]
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism.2008. Available at:http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/deepvein. Accessed June 2009.
[2]
Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients vs Community Residents

John A. Heit, L. Joseph Melton, Christine M. Lohse et al.

Mayo Clinic Proceedings 10.4065/76.11.1102
[22]
Oxman AD "No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice" CMAJ. (1995)
[24]
Shojania KG (2004)
[25]
CMS Office of Public Affairs. Fact Sheet: CMS Proposes Additions to List of Hospital‐Acquired Conditions for Fiscal Year 2009. Available at:http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/factsheet.asp?Counter=3042. Accessed June2009.
[26]
The DVT/PE 2007 Knowledge Transfer Meeting. Proceedings of November 30 2007 meeting. Available at:http://www.uhc.edu/21801.htm. Accessed June2009.
[27]
MaynardG SteinJ. Preventing Hospital‐Acquired Venous Thromboembolism. A Guide for Effective Quality Improvement. Society of Hospital Medicine VTE Quality Improvement Resource Room. Available at:http://www.hospitalmedicine.org/ResourceRoomRedesign/RR_VTE/VTE_Home.cfm. Accessed June 2009.
[28]
Maynard G (2008)
Metrics
104
Citations
28
References
Details
Published
Sep 14, 2009
Vol/Issue
5(1)
Pages
10-18
License
View
Cite This Article
Gregory A. Maynard, Timothy A. Morris, Ian H. Jenkins, et al. (2009). Optimizing prevention of hospital‐acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE): Prospective validation of a VTE risk assessment model. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 5(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.562