journal article Aug 06, 2020

Is it possible to fit extreme climate change indices together seamlessly in the era of accelerated warming?

Abstract
AbstractThis study examines the problematic impact of selecting a different base period (colder 1961–1990 vs. warmer 1988–2017), on the trend magnitude of widely used percentile‐based extreme temperature indices (e.g., warm/cold spells, warm/cold days and nights). The percentile‐based indices are part of a core set of indices (27 in total) that have become a common standard for monitoring climate change, as recommended by the Expert Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices (ETCCDI). The indices were designed to be comparable across regions provided that similar analyses are employed. Unfortunately, the use of different base periods and periods of interest to explore local and global climate change undermines the comparability of findings across regions. When utilizing “day‐count” indices with fixed thresholds, the use of different base/reference periods changes the intercept without influencing the slope (for a given period length). However, this assertion does not hold with percentile‐based indices. Our analyses show that percentile‐based temperature indices (e.g., days with temperature below the 10th or above the 90th percentiles) are particularly susceptible to the problematic use of different base periods. Hence, using percentile‐based indices may have adverse effects on researchers' conclusions. The current paper reports the results of a comparative study that used different base periods for the most commonly used percentile‐based extreme temperature indices. It was found that the (negative) trend magnitude of the cold percentile‐based indices (frequency of cold days and nights and cold spells) is strongly amplified while the (positive) trend magnitude of the warm indices (frequency of warm days and nights and warm spells) is dramatically diminished when percentiles were derived from a base period that included records from the last two decades (e.g., 1981–2010, 1988–2017). These features are even more pronounced when the study period covers only the last 30–40 years.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
32
[2]
Alexander L. (2015)
[3]
Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation

L. V. Alexander, Xiangle Zhang, T. C. Peterson et al.

Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 10.1029/2005jd006290
[5]
Bronaugh D.andWerner A.(2013). zyp: Zhang + Yue‐Pilon trends package. R package version 0.10‐1.http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=zyp.
[9]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014)
[11]
Kendall M.G. (1955)
[13]
Klein Tank A.M.G. (2009)
[14]
Assessment of climate extremes in the Eastern Mediterranean

E. Kostopoulou, P. D. Jones

Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics 10.1007/s00703-005-0122-2
[15]
Nonparametric Tests Against Trend

Henry B. Mann

Econometrica 10.2307/1907187
[16]
Peterson T. (2001)
[18]
Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau

Pranab Kumar Sen

Journal of the American Statistical Association 10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934
[23]
Changes of Extreme Wave Heights in Northern Hemisphere Oceans and Related Atmospheric Circulation Regimes

Xiaolan L. Wang, Val R. Swail

Journal of Climate 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2204:coewhi>2.0.co;2
[24]
World Meteorological Organization (2017)
[28]
Avoiding Inhomogeneity in Percentile-Based Indices of Temperature Extremes

Xuebin Zhang, Gabriele Hegerl, Francis W. Zwiers et al.

Journal of Climate 10.1175/jcli3366.1
[29]
Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data

Xuebin Zhang, Lisa Alexander, Gabriele C. Hegerl et al.

WIREs Climate Change 10.1002/wcc.147
Cited By
26
Geophysical Research Letters
Metrics
26
Citations
32
References
Details
Published
Aug 06, 2020
Vol/Issue
41(S1)
License
View
Cite This Article
Yizhak Yosef, Enric Aguilar, Pinhas Alpert (2020). Is it possible to fit extreme climate change indices together seamlessly in the era of accelerated warming?. International Journal of Climatology, 41(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6740