journal article Open Access Dec 24, 2024

The relationship between muscle mass changes and protein or energy intake in critically ill children: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/jpen.2715
Abstract
AbstractSurvivorship after pediatric critical illness is high in developed countries, but many suffer physical morbidities afterwards. The increasing focus on follow‐up after critical illness has led to more pediatric studies reporting muscle mass changes (using ultrasound), albeit with different results. A systematic literature review was undertaken examining muscle mass changes, assessed by ultrasound of the quadriceps femoris muscle in children who are critically ill. Secondary objectives were to determine if muscle mass was associated with protein intake and/or energy. Databases were searched in July 2024. Eligible experimental or observational studies, published from January 2010 to July 2024 and including children who are critically ill that were aged between ≥37 weeks' gestational age and 18 years who were admitted to the pediatric critical care unit were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute for observational studies critical appraisal instrument was used to assess studies for methodological quality. One hundred and thirty‐five studies were screened, and eight prospective cohort studies were included, involving 411 children. Overall, muscle mass changes reported in seven out of eight of the papers showed a pooled mean muscle mass loss of 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6–11.4) from baseline to days 5–7. Five of the eight publications defined muscular atrophy as a decrease in muscle mass of >10%. Using this cutoff, 92 (49.2%) children developed muscular atrophy during their PICU admission. Overall, muscle mass decreased by nearly 10% during a child's first week in PICU, with almost half of children developing muscular atrophy during their admission.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
34
[1]
Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet). PICANet State of the Nation Report 2024. Accessed August 13 2024.https://picanet.org.uk/annual-reporting-and-publications/
[3]
KosinskiS MohammadRA PitcherM et al. American Thoracic Society. 2020. Accessed September 21 2024.https://www.thoracic.org/patients/patient-resources/resources/post-intensive-care-syndrome.pdf
[10]
JohnsonRW NgKWP DietzAR et al.Muscle atrophy in mechanically‐ventilated critically ill children.PLoS ONE.2018;13(12):e0207720. 10.1371/journal.pone.0207720
[17]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt et al.

BMJ 10.1136/bmj.n71
[18]
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews

Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Shona Kirtley, Siw Waffenschmidt et al.

Systematic Reviews 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
[20]
MoolaS MunnZ TufanaruC et al. Checklist for analytical cross sectional studies. Accessed July 31 2024.https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI_Critical_Appraisal-Checklist_for_Analytical_Cross_Sectional_Studies2017_0.pdf
[21]
Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments

Luke A. McGuinness, Julian P. T. Higgins

Research Synthesis Methods 10.1002/jrsm.1411
[22]
Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage

Wolfgang Viechtbauer

Journal of Statistical Software 10.18637/jss.v036.i03
[23]
HigginsJP LiT DeeksJJ.Chapter 6: Choosing Effect Ieasures and Computing Estimates of Effect. Accessed August 20 2024.https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-06
[34]
World Health Organization (2007)