journal article Open Access Jul 02, 2019

Construct Validity of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQoL) Scale in a Sample of Child Protection Workers

Journal of Traumatic Stress Vol. 32 No. 4 pp. 566-576 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/jts.22410
Abstract
AbstractThe Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale is one of the most widely used measures of compassion satisfaction and fatigue despite there being little publicly available evidence to support its validity. This study, conducted among a sample of 310 child protection workers, assessed the construct validity of this measure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bifactor modeling. The CFA failed to confirm the adequacy of the three‐factor structure proposed by Stamm (2010). In response, a bifactor model postulating a factor structure with a general factor in addition to independent factors (compassion satisfaction, job burnout, and secondary traumatic stress) was proposed, highlighting the unidimensionality of the ProQOL while allowing for each subscale to be used separately. Moreover, this bifactor model of the ProQOL was moderately correlated with the Posttraumatic Disorder Checklist, r = −.427, p < .001, and strongly correlated with scales of well‐being at work, r = .694, p < .001, and psychological distress at work, r = −.666, p < .001, thus supporting the ProQOL's convergent validity. No associations were found between the ProQOL and the Life Event Checklist, which supports the ProQOL's discriminant validity. Overall, the results indicated that compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue represent higher and lower levels of the same construct rather than two different constructs. Researchers and clinicians could therefore compute a single score to rate professionals’ individual levels of professional quality of life.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
50
[5]
Brislin R. W. "Translation and content analysis of oral and written material" Handbook of Cross‐Cultural Psychology (1980)
[8]
A power primer.

Jacob Cohen

Psychological Bulletin 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
[9]
Dang W. "Reliability and validity of Professional Quality of Life Scale among government staff in earthquake‐stricken areas in China" Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases (2015)
[10]
Figley C. R. (1999)
[13]
George D. (2003)
[15]
Gorsuch R. L. (1983)
[16]
Psychometric Properties of the Life Events Checklist

Matt J. Gray, Brett T. Litz, Julie L. Hsu et al.

Assessment 10.1177/1073191104269954
[19]
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

Li‐tze Hu, Peter M. Bentler

Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary... 10.1080/10705519909540118
[22]
Mathieu F. "Running on empty: Compassion fatigue in health professionals" Rehab & Community Care Medicine (2007)
[23]
McDonald R. P. (1999)
[26]
Muthén L. K. (2008)
[28]
Palestini L. "La qualità della vita professionale nel lavoro di soccorso: Un contributo alla validazione italiana della Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) [Professional quality of life in rescue work: Supporting the validation of the Italian version of the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL)]" Psicoterapia Cognitiva E Comportamentale (2009)
[29]
Scoring and Modeling Psychological Measures in the Presence of Multidimensionality

Steven P. Reise, Wes E. Bonifay, Mark G. Haviland

Journal of Personality Assessment 10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
[31]
Multidimensionality and Structural Coefficient Bias in Structural Equation Modeling

Steven P. Reise, Richard Scheines, Keith F. Widaman et al.

Educational and Psychological Measurement 10.1177/0013164412449831
[32]
Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma

William Revelle, Richard E. Zinbarg

Psychometrika 10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
[33]
Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices.

Anthony Rodriguez, Steven P. Reise, Mark G. Haviland

Psychological Methods 10.1037/met0000045
[36]
Simms L. J. (2007)
[39]
Sprang G. "An inter‐battery exploratory factor analysis of primary and secondary traumatic stress: Determining a best practice approach to assessment" Best Practices in Mental Health (2015)
[40]
Stamm B. H. (2002)
[41]
Stamm B. H.(2009).Professional Quality of Life: Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue Version 5 (ProQOL). Retrieved from:https://proqol.org/uploads/ProQOL-5_French.pdf
[42]
Stamm B. H. (2010)
[43]
Stamm B. H.(2019).How the ProQOL is used in research. Retrieved fromhttps://proqol.org/Research.html
[49]
Weathers F. W. (1993)
[50]
West S. G. (2012)
Metrics
104
Citations
50
References
Details
Published
Jul 02, 2019
Vol/Issue
32(4)
Pages
566-576
License
View
Funding
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Award: TVG251591
Cite This Article
Steve Geoffrion, Josianne Lamothe, Julien Morizot, et al. (2019). Construct Validity of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQoL) Scale in a Sample of Child Protection Workers. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 32(4), 566-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22410
Related

You May Also Like

The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma

Richard G. Tedeschi, Lawrence G. Calhoun · 1996

4,694 citations

Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review

P. Alex Linley, Stephen Joseph · 2004

1,541 citations