journal article Jan 16, 2017

Complications and parent satisfaction in pediatric osseointegrated bone‐conduction hearing implants

The Laryngoscope Vol. 127 No. 9 pp. 2165-2170 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/lary.26469
Abstract
ObjectiveTo assess long‐term complication rate and parental satisfaction of osseointegrated bone conduction hearing implants (OBCHIs).Study DesignRetrospective chart review of children undergoing OBCHIs.MethodsA retrospective chart review of children undergoing OBCHIs for the treatment of conductive, mixed, and single‐sided sensorineural hearing loss in children.ResultsForty‐five subjects were identified with 0.3 to 10.4 years of follow‐up. The mean/median age and age range at implant were 9.0/7.8 and 1.7 to 19.1 years. The underlying hearing loss for the cohort included conductive (N = 30), sensorineural (N = 7), and mixed (N = 8) hearing loss. Conductive hearing loss, caused by aural atresia (62.9), was the most common indication for implantation. Fifty‐eight complications occurred in 29 subjects, most related to skin infection or overgrowth. Seventeen events required revision surgery, and 18 required oral antibiotics and/or office‐based cauterization. Children under the age of 5 years were more likely to have failure of osseointegration or require revision surgery. Parents of 33 subjects underwent a phone interview; 76% rated the overall satisfaction as satisfied or very satisfied.ConclusionA large percentage of children undergoing OBCHI develop postoperative complications, and up to 44% require revision surgery—a figure higher than generally reported and higher than in adults. No factors were found to adequately explain the higher complication rates in children compared to adults. Despite the occurrence of complications, parents viewed this device as satisfactory from many perspectives.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 127:2165–2170, 2017
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
21
[3]
Wazen JJ "Long term results with the titanium bone anchored hearing aid: the US experience" Am J Otol (1998)
[5]
Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids

John W. House, Joe Walter Kutz

Otology & Neurotology 10.1097/mao.0b013e31802c74c4
[15]
Holgers KM "Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin‐penetrating titanium implants for bone‐anchored hearing aids" Am J Otol (1988)