Researchers' Views on Preprints and Open Access Publishing: Results From a Free‐Answer Survey of Japanese Molecular Biologists
A survey conducted in 2022 amongst members of the Molecular Biology Society of Japan (
n
= 633) about preprints and open access journals included qualitative data from free‐response answers (
n
= 161). Analysis of the free‐form responses suggests that researchers believe that peer review of papers is the foundation for ensuring the credibility of research content. The trust‐building mechanism achieved through peer review shapes the research community. For this reason, researchers are extremely cautious about preprints that have not undergone peer review within their own fields. This foundation has fostered a sense of responsibility within the community, and this sense of responsibility, which is being fulfilled by ensuring the quality of research, is a mixture of both a sense of responsibility towards the community itself and a sense of responsibility towards the outside world, namely the relationship between researchers and society. Researchers also appear to view the rise in Article Processing Charges (APCs) as a problem for the entire community, rather than simply an issue for individual researchers. In the field of molecular biology, where collaborative research between universities and companies is common, differences in normative awareness based on position are reflected in the various attitudes towards preprints and open access.
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
Madhuri Kumari, Subaveerapandiyan A
Heidi M. Levitt, Michael Bamberg, John W. Creswell et al.
- Published
- Jan 01, 2026
- Vol/Issue
- 39(1)
- License
- View
You May Also Like
Liz Allen, Alison O’Connell · 2019
219 citations
Weishu Liu · 2016
122 citations
Donald Klein, Mark Ware · 2003
60 citations
David C. Prosser · 2003
49 citations
Feng (Kevin) Jiang, Ken Hyland · 2022
28 citations