journal article Apr 29, 2019

The Range and Reproducibility of the Liver Frailty Index

Abstract
The Liver Frailty Index (LFI), composed of 3 performance‐based tests (grip strength, chair stands, and balance), is a tool specifically developed in patients with cirrhosis to objectively measure physical function, a critical determinant of health outcomes. We aimed to (1) determine the range of LFI scores in adults with chronic liver disease but without cirrhosis, (2) determine the range of LFI scores in adults without known liver disease, and (3) evaluate reproducibility of the LFI in adults with cirrhosis listed for liver transplantation. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed interrater reliability of the LFI. Included were 91 adults with chronic liver disease, 109 adults without known liver disease, and 166 adults with cirrhosis with median Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease–sodium of 16. Median (interquartile range) LFI was 3.6 (3.1‐4.1) in adults with cirrhosis, 3.1 (2.5‐3.7) in adults with chronic liver disease but not cirrhosis, and 2.7 (2.2‐3.2) in adults without liver disease (P < 0.001). Using established LFI cutoffs for robust, prefrail, and frail categories, adults with cirrhosis or chronic liver disease were less likely to be robust (29% versus 53% versus 77%) and more likely to be prefrail (57% versus 42% versus 22%) or frail (14% versus 5% versus 1%) when compared with adults without liver disease (P < 0.001). The LFI had excellent reliability with ICC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.91‐0.95). In conclusion, the LFI has external validity in noncirrhotic populations and is highly reproducible among different raters. This objective assessment tool can be implemented in outpatient clinical practice or research to operationalize the concept of physical frailty.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
12
[1]
"Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype" J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci (2001) 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146
[2]
Lower-Extremity Function in Persons over the Age of 70 Years as a Predictor of Subsequent Disability

Jack M. Guralnik, Luigi Ferrucci, Eleanor M. Simonsick et al.

New England Journal of Medicine 1995 10.1056/nejm199503023320902
[3]
"Development of a novel frailty index to predict mortality in patients with end‐stage liver disease" Hepatology (2017) 10.1002/hep.29219
[4]
Frailty Predicts Waitlist Mortality in Liver Transplant Candidates

J.C. Lai, S. Feng, N.A. Terrault et al.

American Journal of Transplantation 2014 10.1111/ajt.12762
[5]
"Functional decline in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation: results from the functional assessment in liver transplantation (FrAILT) study" Hepatology (2016) 10.1002/hep.28316
[6]
"The Liver Frailty Index improves mortality prediction of the subjective clinician assessment in patients with cirrhosis" Am J Gastroenterol (2018) 10.1038/ajg.2017.443
[7]
"The number connection tests A and B: interindividual variability and use for the assessment of early hepatic encephalopathy" J Hepatol (1998) 10.1016/s0168-8278(98)80289-4
[8]
"A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research" J Chiropr Med (2016) 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
[9]
"Computing inter‐rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial" Tutor Quant Methods Psychol (2012) 10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
[10]
"Editorial: Advancing adoption of frailty to improve the care of patients with cirrhosis: time for a consensus on a frailty index" Am J Gastroenterol (2016) 10.1038/ajg.2016.485
[11]
"Physical frailty after liver transplantation" Am J Transplant (2018) 10.1111/ajt.14675
[12]
"Challenges of self‐reported medical conditions and electronic medical records among members of a large military cohort" BMC Med Res Methodol (2008) 10.1186/1471-2288-8-37