journal article Jul 07, 2015

Modeling Consumers’ Adoption Intentions of Remote Mobile Payments in the United Kingdom: Extending UTAUT with Innovativeness, Risk, and Trust

Psychology & Marketing Vol. 32 No. 8 pp. 860-873 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/mar.20823
Abstract
ABSTRACTMobile payments (MPs) are predicted to be one of the future's most successful mobile services but have achieved limited acceptance in developed countries to date. PCs are still the preferred technology for online shopping in the United Kingdom but the continued growth of mobile commerce (MC) is highly correlated with the success of remote MPs (RMPs). Currently MP research has largely ignored the variations between different MP solutions, and existing MP adoption studies have predominantly utilized Davis’ (1989) Technology Acceptance Model, which has been criticized for having a deterministic approach without much consideration for users’ individual characteristics. Therefore, this study applied the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), extended with more consumer‐related constructs, to explore the factors affecting nonusers’ intentions to adopt RMP in the United Kingdom. Quantitative data were collected (n = 268) and structural equation modeling was undertaken. The findings revealed that performance expectancy, social influence, innovativeness, and perceived risk significantly influenced nonusers’ intentions to adopt RMP, whereas effort expectancy did not. Inclusion of MP knowledge as a moderating variable revealed that there was a significant difference in the effect of trust on behavioral intention for those who knew about MP than for those who did not. These findings have important theoretical and practical implications, particularly for the development and marketing of RMP, which will support the long‐term success of MC.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
78
[1]
A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology

Ritu Agarwal, Jayesh Prasad

Information Systems Research 10.1287/isre.9.2.204
[6]
Barclays.(2014).Mobile payments. Retrieved June 1 2014 fromhttp://www.barclays.co.uk/MobileBankingservices/MobilePayments/P1242670219368.
[8]
Cellan‐Jones R.(2012). Mobile money – Has its moment come? BBC News: Technology February 16 2012. Retrieved March 5 2012 fromhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology‐17057570.
[9]
Centre for Retail Research.(2014).Online retailing: Britain Europe and the US. Retrieved January 8 2015 fromhttp://www.retailresearch.org/onlineretailing.php.
[11]
Chandra S. "Evaluating the role of trust in consumer adoption of mobile payment systems: An empirical analysis" Communications of the Association for Information Systems (2010) 10.17705/1cais.02729
[16]
A structural look at consumer innovativeness and self‐congruence in new product purchases

Kelly O. Cowart, Gavin L. Fox, Andrew E. Wilson

Psychology & Marketing 10.1002/mar.20256
[20]
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

Claes Fornell, David F. Larcker

Journal of Marketing Research 10.1177/002224378101800104
[21]
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships

Shankar Ganesan

Journal of Marketing 10.1177/002224299405800201
[22]
Gaur A. &Ondrus J.(2012). The role of banks in the mobile payment ecosystem: A strategic asset perspective. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Electronic Commerce August 7–8 2012 Singapore. 10.1145/2346536.2346570
[25]
Hair J. (2006)
[27]
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

Li‐tze Hu, Peter M. Bentler

Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary... 10.1080/10705519909540118
[28]
Jones W.(2014). Will bank customers PayM Ping ‘em or look for a cashpoint?Monitise April 28 2014. Retrieved June 1 2014 fromhttp://www.monitise.com/insights/2014/04/28/will‐bank‐customers‐paym‐pingem‐look‐cashpoint/.
[33]
Predicting the determinants of the NFC-enabled mobile credit card acceptance: A neural networks approach

Lai-Ying Leong, Teck-Soon Hew, Garry Wei-Han Tan et al.

Expert Systems with Applications 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.04.018
[39]
Mandrik C. "Exploring the concept and measurement of general risk aversion" Advances in Consumer Research (2005)
[44]
Nunnally J. C. (1994)
[45]
Ondrus J. Lyytinen K. &Pigneur Y.(2009). Why mobile payments fail? Towards a dynamic and multi‐perspective explanation. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences January 5–8 2009 Waikoloa.
[48]
Pritchard S.(2014). Ease of use will decide ewallets’ fate.Financial Times December 4 2014. Retrieved January 18 2015 fromhttp://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/682b6262‐7565‐11e4‐a1a9‐00144feabdc0.html#axzz3PSLht5U5.

Showing 50 of 78 references

Cited By
706
Journal of Financial Services Marke...
International Journal of Human–Comp...
Acceptance and use of ChatGPT in the academic community

Artur Strzelecki, Karina Cicha · 2024

Education and Information Technolog...
Journal of Hospitality Marketing &a...
Technological Forecasting and Socia...
Cogent Social Sciences
Metrics
706
Citations
78
References
Details
Published
Jul 07, 2015
Vol/Issue
32(8)
Pages
860-873
License
View
Cite This Article
Emma L. Slade, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Niall C. Piercy, et al. (2015). Modeling Consumers’ Adoption Intentions of Remote Mobile Payments in the United Kingdom: Extending UTAUT with Innovativeness, Risk, and Trust. Psychology & Marketing, 32(8), 860-873. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20823