journal article Open Access Oct 01, 2018

Catch Efficiency of Groundgears in a Bottom Trawl Fishery: A Case Study of the Barents Sea Haddock

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/mcf2.10048
Abstract
Abstract
The catch efficiency of two types of groundgear—a conventional rockhopper and a new type of groundgear called the semicircular spreading gear (SCSG)—was investigated through experimental fishing for Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus conducted in the Barents Sea. A retainer bag was attached behind the footrope of the trawl, and the number of fish that were overrun by the trawl was compared with the catch in the trawl cod end. The catch efficiency increased slightly for larger Haddock for both groundgears. The SCSG was found to have a significantly higher catch efficiency than the conventional rockhopper groundgear. The estimated improvement in catch efficiency varied between 4.5% and 12.3%, with an equivalent reduction in escape rate underneath the groundgear of more than 70%. The rockhopper groundgear can have a catch efficiency as low as 76%, corresponding with values reported in previous studies. Average catch efficiency for the rockhopper gear was significantly lower during the night in comparison with the daytime. No such difference was found with the SCSG. The SCSG is more efficient for catching Haddock, and it is lighter than the rockhopper groundgear. Both are important factors in reducing seabed impact and fuel consumption. When compared to results of a similar study on Atlantic Cod Gadus morhua, we found that in general, both groundgears had a greater catch efficiency for Haddock, which accords with differences in behavior between the two species.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
25
[1]
Improving catch efficiency by changing ground gear design: Case study of Northeast Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua ) in the Barents Sea bottom trawl fishery

Jesse Brinkhof, Roger B. Larsen, Bent Herrmann et al.

Fisheries Research 2017 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.10.008
[2]
Chopin "The condition of fish escaping from fishing gears—a review" Fisheries Research (1995) 10.1016/0165-7836(94)00301-c
[3]
Dahm (1992)
[4]
Engås "Escape of fish under the fishing line of a Norwegian sampling trawl and its influence on survey results" ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil (1989) 10.1093/icesjms/45.3.269
[5]
Engås "Day and night fish distribution pattern in the net mouth area of the Norwegian bottom-sampling trawl" ICES Rapports et Procès-Verbaux des Réunions (1990)
[6]
Glass "Comparison of the reactions of fish to a trawl gear, at high and low light intensities" Fisheries Research (1989) 10.1016/0165-7836(89)90059-3
[7]
Godø "Escapement of fish during bottom trawl sampling—implications for resource assessment" Fisheries Research (1992) 10.1016/0165-7836(92)90082-5
[8]
Grimaldo (2014)
[9]
Herrmann "Prediction of selectivity from morphological conditions: methodology and a case study on cod (Gadus morhua)" Fisheries Research (2009) 10.1016/j.fishres.2009.01.002
[10]
Understanding the Size Selectivity of Redfish (Sebastes spp.) in North Atlantic Trawl Codends

B Herrmann, M Sistiaga, K N Nielsen et al.

Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 2012 10.2960/j.v44.m680
[11]
Escapement of gadoid fish beneath a commercial bottom trawl: Relevance to the overall trawl selectivity

Ólafur Arnar Ingólfsson, Terje Jørgensen

Fisheries Research 2006 10.1016/j.fishres.2005.12.017
[12]
Kim "Measuring the brightness contrast of fishing gear, the visual stimulus for fish capture" Fisheries Research (1998) 10.1016/s0165-7836(97)00087-8
[13]
Krag "Selective Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) trawling: avoiding cod (Gadus morhua) bycatch" Fisheries Research (2010) 10.1016/j.fishres.2009.09.001
[14]
Main "A study of the fish capture process in a bottom trawl by direct observations from a towed underwater vehicle" Scottish Fisheries Research Reports (1981)
[15]
Mueller "Video and acoustic camera techniques for studying fish under ice, a review and comparison" Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries (2006) 10.1007/s11160-006-9011-0
[16]
R Core Team (2013)
[17]
Ryer "Laboratory evidence for behavioural impairment of fish escaping trawls: a review" ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil (2004) 10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.06.004
[18]
Sistiaga "Understanding limits to cod and Haddock separation using size selectivity in a multispecies trawl fishery: an application of FISHSELECT" Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (2011) 10.1139/f2011-017
[19]
Walsh (1989)
[20]
Walsh "Size-dependent selection at the footgear of a groundfish survey trawl" North American Journal of Fisheries Management (1992) 10.1577/1548-8675(1992)012<0625:sdsatf>2.3.co;2
[21]
Walsh "Behavioural reactions of demersal fish to bottom trawls at various light conditions" ICES Marine Science Symposia (1993)
[22]
Wardle (1993)
[23]
Weinberg "The effect of artificial light on escapement beneath a survey trawl" ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil (1999) 10.1006/jmsc.1999.0442
[24]
Wileman (1996)
[25]
Winger (2010)
Metrics
16
Citations
25
References
Details
Published
Oct 01, 2018
Vol/Issue
10(5)
Pages
493-507
License
View
Funding
Research Council of Norway Award: 216423/O70
Norges Forskningsråd Award: 216423/O70
Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries
Arctic University of Norway
Cite This Article
Roger B. Larsen, Bent Herrmann, Jesse Brinkhof, et al. (2018). Catch Efficiency of Groundgears in a Bottom Trawl Fishery: A Case Study of the Barents Sea Haddock. Marine and Coastal Fisheries, 10(5), 493-507. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcf2.10048