journal article Dec 01, 2019

Metal artifact reduction for practical dental computed tomography by improving interpolation‐based reconstruction with deep learning

Medical Physics Vol. 46 No. 12 · Wiley
Abstract
PurposeMetal artifact is a quite common problem in diagnostic dental computed tomography (CT) images. Due to the high attenuation of heavy materials such as metal, severe global artifacts can occur in reconstructions. Typical metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques segment out the metal regions and estimate the corrupted projection data by various interpolation methods. However, interpolations are not accurate and introduce new artifacts or even deform the teeth in the reconstructed image. This work presents a new strategy to take advantage of the power of deep learning for metal artifact reduction.MethodThe analysis first uses coarse reconstructions from simulated locally interpolated data affected by metal fillings as a starting point. A deep learning network is then trained using the simulated data and applied to practical data. Thus, an easily implemented three‐step MAR method is formed: Firstly, use the acquired projection data to create a preliminary image reconstruction with linearly interpolated data for the metal‐related projections. Secondly, a deep learning network is used to remove the artifacts from the linear interpolation and recover the nonmetal region information. Thirdly, the method adds the ROI reconstruction of the metal regions. The structures behind the shading artifacts in the direct filtered back‐projection (FBP) reconstruction can be partially recovered by interpolation‐based MAR (I‐MAR) with the network further correcting for interpolation errors. The key to this method is that the linear interpolation reconstruction errors can be easily simulated to train a network and the effectiveness of the network can be easily generalized to I‐MAR results in real situations.ResultsWe trained a network with a simulation dataset and validated the network against a separate simulation dataset. Then, the network was tested using simulation data that did not overlap with the training/validation datasets and real patient datasets. Both tests gave encouraging results with accurate tooth structure recovery and few artifacts. The relative root mean square error and structure similarity index method indexes were significantly improved in the tests. The method was also evaluated by two experienced dentists who gave positive evaluations.ConclusionsThis work presents a strategy to build a transferable learning from simulations to practical systems for metal artifact reduction using a supervised deep learning method. The system transforms the MAR analyses to an interpolation‐artifact reduction problem to recover structural details from the coarse interpolation reconstruction. In this way, training data from simulations with ground truth labels can easily model the similar features in real data with I‐MAR as the bridge. The network can seamlessly optimize both simulations and real data. The whole method is easily implemented with little computational cost. Test results demonstrated that this is an effective MAR method applicable to practical dental CT systems.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
23
[4]
KratzB OehlerM BuzugTM.On limitations of 1d interpolation‐based metal artifact reduction approaches – a comparison of FBP versus ML‐EM. IFMEBE Proceedings.2009;25:398–401. 10.1007/978-3-642-03879-2_113
[6]
LiM LiuZ DongY SuK LuoK.A prior‐interpolation based metal artifact reduction algorithm in computed tomography. International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics.2015;24–28. 10.1109/bmei.2014.7002735
[8]
DeManB NuytsJ DupontP MarchalG.Reduction of metal streak artifacts in X‐ray computed tomography using a transmission maximum a posteriori algorithm. Nuclear Science Symposium 1999. Conference Record 1999;850–854.
[10]
Low-Dose CT With a Residual Encoder-Decoder Convolutional Neural Network

Hu Chen, Mannudeep K. Kalra, Feng Lin et al.

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 10.1109/tmi.2017.2715284
[11]
ZhangH LiL QiaoK et al.Image prediction for limited‐angle tomography via deep learning with convolutional neural network.2016;ArXiv:1607.08707.
[12]
ZhangC XingY.CT artifact reduction via U‐Net CNN. Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing (Vol. 10574). International Society for Optics and Photonics.2018. 10.1117/12.2293903
[13]
Framing U-Net via Deep Convolutional Framelets: Application to Sparse-View CT

Yoseob Han, Jong Chul Ye

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 10.1109/tmi.2018.2823768
[14]
GjestebyL ShanH WangG.Deep neural network for CT metal artifact reduction with a perceptual loss function. The Fifth International Conference on Image Formation in X‐ray Computed Tomography.2018;439–443.
[15]
YangQ WangG.Deep learning methods to guide CT image reconstruction and reduce metal artifacts. Proceedings of the SPIE.2017;132:101322W.
[16]
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition

Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio et al.

Proceedings of the IEEE 10.1109/5.726791
[17]
RonnebergerO FischerP BroxT.U‐net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation.2015;arXiv:1505.04597.
[18]
YeJC HanYS.Deep convolutional framelets: a general deep learning for inverse problems.2017;arXiv:1708.08333.
[19]
LoffeS SzegedyC.Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learnin.2015;448–456.
[20]
VedaldiA LencK.Matconvnet: convolutional neural networks for Matlab. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia.2014:689–692. 10.1145/2733373.2807412
[22]
HoreA ZiouD.Image Quality Metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM. International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE.2010:2366–2369. 10.1109/icpr.2010.579