journal article Open Access Jun 19, 2024

In‐mold rheology and automated process control for injection molding of recycled polypropylene

Polymer Engineering & Science Vol. 64 No. 9 pp. 4112-4127 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/pen.26836
Abstract
AbstractManufacturing plastic parts with secondary feedstocks has risen to the forefront of importance in recent years. However, the variation in molecular weight and rheology of secondary feedstock can lead to inconsistent part quality. This work evaluates the effectiveness of a novel closed‐loop adaptive process control system that adjusts nozzle pressure in response to in‐mold pressure data. Five different recycled polypropylene blends, with a broad distribution of flow properties, were evaluated to determine the effectiveness of the control system at reducing processing variation. The experimental results show that the process control strategy reduced the variation within the mold, as seen by in‐mold pressure curves and calculated in‐mold viscosity values. Additionally, the parameters that control the automated process adjustments were investigated, showing the importance of optimization. The analysis of the correlation between in‐mold rheology and mechanical properties showed a slight variation in the mechanical properties and parts weight with a coefficient of variation of under 5%. Overall, the results demonstrate the ability of pressure‐controlled molding and automated viscosity adjustment to reduce the variability when molding a secondary feedstock.Highlights
Pressure‐controlled injection molding of recycled polypropylene.
Automated closed‐loop adaptive process control methodology.
Methodology resulted in a reduction in pressure variation during molding.
Changes in mechanical properties and in‐mold viscosity were investigated.
Results show the potential of pressure‐controlled molding at reducing variation.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
51
[11]
AsadizanjaniN GaoRX FanZ KazmerDO.Viscosity Measurement in Injection Molding Using a Multivariate Sensor.2012http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use 10.1115/isfa2012-7246
[13]
Online quality monitoring of molten resin in injection molding

Jian-Yu Chen, Kai-Jie Yang, Ming-Shyan Huang

International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.02.019
[21]
ChenJY LiuCY HuangMS.Enhancement of Injection Molding Consistency by Adjusting Velocity/Pressure Switching Time Based on Clamping Force.
[27]
AltonenG NeufarthR SchillerG BergC.Alternative Pressure Control For An Injection Molding Apparatus.2016.
[28]
AltonenM McConellN BreidenbachS GergovG.Injection Molding Machines and Methods for Accounting for Changes in Material Properties During Injection Molding Runs.2015.
[30]
Loaldi D "Pressure driven filling in the injection molding process of micro structured parts" Ann Techn Conf—ANTEC Conf Proc (2020)
[41]
Optimization process parameters and adaptive quality monitoring injection molding process for materials with different viscosity

Chi-Wei Su, Wei-Jie Su, Feng-Jung Cheng et al.

Polymer Testing 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107526
[47]
Kazmer DO (2012)
[48]
Deanin R (1972)
[50]
NunesRW MartinJR JohnsonJF.Influence of Molecular Weight and Molecular Weight Distribution on Mechanical Properties of Polymers.

Showing 50 of 51 references

Related

You May Also Like