journal article Open Access Apr 01, 2026

Impact of COVID‐19 and CFTR Modulators on Cystic Fibrosis: A Real‐World Analysis of Care Patterns

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/ppul.71595
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Introduction
Novel therapeutics and rapid expansion of telehealth have reshaped cystic fibrosis (CF) care; however, the impact on visit patterns and equitable access across the CF population remains unclear. We characterized changes in visit patterns from 2017 to 2022 and the association of sociodemographic and clinical factors with visit frequency in 2022.


Methods
This observational cohort study analyzed 2017–2022 US CF Foundation Patient Registry data for people aged 6–65 years. We described trends in care utilization and used adjusted longitudinal mixed‐effects models to evaluate predictors of between‐visit interval (BVI).


Results
The study included 28,340 people and 463,745 encounters. Average BVI increased 22.6% from 2019 to 2022, with larger increases among adults. The effect of COVID‐related changes and highly effective modulator use on BVI (average increase in BVI of 13.5 and 9.3 days, respectively) were roughly additive for those with concomitant exposures. Starting elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) initially shortened BVI, followed by sustained increases. Non‐White and Hispanic individuals had shorter BVI than their White, non‐Hispanic counterparts. After adjustment, insurance changes and greater residential distance from CF centers were associated with longer BVI.


Conclusion
Advances in CF therapeutics and COVID‐19‐related care adaptations have both markedly influenced visit frequency, indicating evolving care models responsive to the needs of people with CF. Persistent disparities by race, insurance status, and geographic location reveal ongoing challenges in achieving equitable access to routine CF care. Targeted strategies to address these inequities and enhance integrated care are essential to optimize outcomes for people with CF.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
30
[3]
“Annual Data Report ” ©2023 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry 2022
[4]
“Annual Data Report ” ©2024 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry 2023.
[8]
Cystic fibrosis foundation position paper: Redefining the CF care model

D.M. Goetz, R.F. Brown, S.S. Filigno et al.

Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 10.1016/j.jcf.2024.08.007
[13]
A CFTR Potentiator in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and the G551D Mutation

Bonnie W. Ramsey, Jane Davies, N. Gerard McElvaney et al.

New England Journal of Medicine 10.1056/nejmoa1105185
[14]
Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor in Residual-Function Heterozygotes with Cystic Fibrosis

Steven M. Rowe, Cori Daines, Felix C. Ringshausen et al.

New England Journal of Medicine 10.1056/nejmoa1709847
[19]
“Predictor Effects Graphics Gallery ” Fox JW 2020.
[20]
“Rural Urban Commuting Area Codes Data ” WWAMI Rural Health Research Center https://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca‐uses.php.
[22]
“Annual Data Report ” ©2025 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry 2024.
Metrics
0
Citations
30
References
Details
Published
Apr 01, 2026
Vol/Issue
61(4)
License
View
Cite This Article
Alexandra C. Hinton, Edmund H. Sears, Sara Lopez‐Pintado, et al. (2026). Impact of COVID‐19 and CFTR Modulators on Cystic Fibrosis: A Real‐World Analysis of Care Patterns. Pediatric Pulmonology, 61(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71595