journal article Nov 12, 2021

Preparation and Characterization of Pour‐Casting Red Phosphorus Smoke Agents with HTPB as Binder

Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics Vol. 46 No. 12 pp. 1784-1799 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/prep.202100229
Abstract
AbstractThe main aim of this study is to develop the vacuum pour‐casting process of the red phosphorus smoke agents. The typical composition of MK 58 marine location marker prepared by tamp‐casting process is red phosphorus (RP)/magnesium (Mg)/manganese dioxide (MnO2)/zinc oxide (ZnO)/epoxy resin (ER), which was selected as the original formula. Epoxy resin (ER) was replaced by hydroxyl terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) as the binder. First of all, simultaneous differential scanning calorimetry‐thermogravimetric analysis (STA DSC‐TGA) and vacuum stability tester (VST) were used to analyze the thermochemical characteristics, stability and chemical compatibility of the formula. Afterwards, Taguchi's experimental design method was used to design nine experimental conditions by way of orthogonal array with four control factors and three levels, and the scaled‐down smoke pellets were prepared using the vacuum pour‐casting method. The combustion phenomenon of these smoke pellets was recorded by the visual‐image capture system, and the flame temperature was measured by the temperature measurement system. The burning rate was chosen as the quality characteristic to analyze the optimal parameter combination of minimum burning rate. In addition, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM‐EDS), tensile testing machine (TTM) and hardness tester (HT) were employed to observe the uniformity of the composition distribution in the pellet and to measure the mechanical strength and hardness of the pellets. Smoke density test chamber (SDTC) was used to measure the specific optical density of smoke generated by RP smoke agent. Finally, the operating conditions of the optimal parameter combination determined by Taguchi method were used to prepare the full‐size smoke candle, and its burning performance was verified and the feasibility of the vacuum pour‐casting technology was evaluated. The experimental results indicated that the optimal combination of parameters was the RP mixture/HTPB mass ratio of 84 : 16, the NCO/OH ratio of IPDI to HTPB (R value) of 1.6, the additional DOA of 4.5 wt % and the curing temperature of 50 °C. The prepared scaled‐down smoke pellets had good stability, chemical compatibility, hardness, mechanical properties and burning smoke density. In addition, the burning time and performance of the full‐size smoke candles prepared by vacuum pour‐casting technology also met the requirements.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
36
[1]
P. J. D. Collins Overview on red phosphorus- an international perspective (Invited) Proc. 27thInt. Pyrotechnics Seminar Colorado USA July 16–21 2000. p. 191.
[2]
G. D. Artz Red phosphorus castable smoke producing composition United States Patent No.: 3 650 856 Boeing North American Inc. 1972.
[4]
L. Stoenescu Colored pyrotechnic smoke-producing composition United States Patent No.: 2014/0238258A1 CSI Penn Arms LLC 2014.
[5]
G. Diviacchi J. A. Domanico J. E. May D. R. Redding Low toxicity environmentally friendly violet smoke generating compositions and methods of making the same United States Patent No.: 10 663 272 The United States of America as Represented by the Secretary of the Army 2020.
[6]
National Research Council Division on Earth and Life Studies Commission on Life Sciences Subcommittee on Military Smokes and Obscurants Toxicity of Military Smokes and Obscurants: Volume 2 National Academies Press Washington D. C. 2010 p. 18.
[7]
J. Bomar R. Null J. Wallace (eds.) Gunner's Mate 1 and C Naval Education and Training Professional Development and Technology Center Navedtra 1996 pp. 1–11.
[8]
F. A. Niehaus B. Landstrom Performance oriented packaging testing of polystyrene foam container for MK 58 Marine Location Marker Navel Weapons Support Center Indiana 1991 p. 13. 10.21236/ada236996
[9]
F. E. Montgomery A 1/10 Scale Pilot Plant for the Ecological Demilitarization of Mk 25 Marine Location Markers/Red Phosphorus Composition Naval Weapons Support Center Indiana 1977 p. 1.
[10]
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Water range assessment for the VACAPES Range Complex. (Final report) U. S. Department of the Navy Washington D. C. 2010 pp. 3.1–73.
[11]
T. Liberman Smoke composition and method of making same United States Patent No.: 4 841 865 Minister of National Defence of Canada 1989.
[12]
T. Liberman Smoke producing composition for pyrotechnic markers method for the production thereof and pyrotechnic markers containing same UK Patent Application No.: GB 2 206 343 A Minister of National Defence of Canada UK Secretary of State for Defence 1989.
[13]
B. E. Douda White smoke composition containing red phosphorous United States Patent No.: 3 607 472 US Department of Navy 1971.
[14]
C. A. Knapp N. J. Wayne Red phosphorous smoke producing composition United States Patent No.: 4 534 810 US Department of Army 1985.
[16]
N. Davies Red phosphorus for use in screening smoke compositions Pentagon Reports Royal Military College of Science Cranfield University Shrivenham 1999 p. 44.
[17]
ATK Thiokol Propulsion Castable Solvent-Free Red Phosphorus Smokes for Target Markers SERDP Program PP-1180 ATK Thiokol Propulsion Utah 2003 p. 1.
[18]
Standard Operating Procedure Manual for Loading assembly and packaging of MK58 smoke marker 202nd Arsenal Production and Manufacturing Center of the Armament Bureau Ministry of National Defense R. O. C. Edition 2.1 May 13 2020 (in Chinese).
[19]
MIL-STD-1751 A Department of Defense Test Method Standard: Safety and Performance Tests for the Qualification of Explosives (High explosives Propellants and Pyrotechnics) U. S. Department of Defense December 11 2001.
[21]
Standardization Agreement (STANAG) 4147: Chemical Compatibility of Ammunition Components with Explosives (Non-Nuclear Applications) NATO Military Agency for Standardization; Edition 2 June 5 2001.
[22]
S. Taguchi Taguchi Methods and QFD: Hows and Whys for Management American Supplier Institute Michigan 1987 p. 1.
[23]
W. G. Cochran G. M. Cox Experimental Design 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons New York 1992 p. 114.
[30]
Babar Z. "Thermal Decomposition, Ignition and Kinetic Evaluation of Magnesium and Aluminium Fuelled Pyrotechnic Compositions" Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mater. (2015)
[31]
Shan C. M. "Thermal Decomposition and Stability of Red Phosphorus Smoke Agent with Different Oxidants" Explosive Materials (2018)
[34]
Ilyushin M. A. "I. V. shugalei, Study of the Interaction of Polynitro Compounds with Transition Metals Coordination Complexes with 1,5-Pentamethylenetetrazole as a Ligand" Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mater. (2010)
[35]
Stankovic M. "Compatibility Examination of Explosive and Polymer Materials by Thermal Methods" Sci.-Tech. Rev. (2003)
Related

You May Also Like

Review on Melt Cast Explosives

Pasupala Ravi, Dilip M. Badgujar · 2011

229 citations

Tetrazine Explosives

David E. Chavez, Michael A. Hiskey · 2004

170 citations

Promising CL‐20‐Based Energetic Material by Cocrystallization

Stephen R. Anderson, Pascal Dubé · 2016

92 citations

Review on Energetic Thermoplastic Elastomers (ETPEs) for Military Science

Arun Kanti Sikder, Sreekantha Reddy · 2012

91 citations

Molecular structure of the ideal solid propellant binder

Ross G. Stacer, D. Mark Husband · 1991

83 citations