journal article Nov 18, 2010

Structural and thermodynamic analysis of the GFP:GFP‐nanobody complex

Protein Science Vol. 19 No. 12 pp. 2389-2401 · Wiley
Abstract
AbstractThe green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐nanobody is a single‐chain VHH antibody domain developed with specific binding activity against GFP and is emerging as a powerful tool for isolation and cellular engineering of fluorescent protein fusions in many different fields of biological research. Using X‐ray crystallography and isothermal titration calorimetry, we determine the molecular details of GFP:GFP‐nanobody complex formation and explain the basis of high affinity and at the same time high specificity of protein binding. Although the GFP‐nanobody can also bind YFP, it cannot bind the closely related CFP or other fluorescent proteins from the mFruit series. CFP differs from GFP only within the central chromophore and at one surface amino acid position, which lies in the binding interface. Using this information, we have engineered a CFP variant (I146N) that is also able to bind the GFP‐nanobody with high affinity, thus extending the toolbox of genetically encoded fluorescent probes that can be isolated using the GFP‐nanobody.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
35
[1]
Constructing and Exploiting the Fluorescent Protein Paintbox (Nobel Lecture)

Roger Y. Tsien

Angewandte Chemie International Edition 10.1002/anie.200901916
[2]
Alternative non-antibody scaffolds for molecular recognition

Arne Skerra

Current Opinion in Biotechnology 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.04.010
[15]
Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein

Nathan C Shaner, Robert E Campbell, Paul A Steinbach et al.

Nature Biotechnology 10.1038/nbt1037
[16]
Crystal Structure of the Aequorea victoria Green Fluorescent Protein

Mats Ormö, Andrew B. Cubitt, Karen Kallio et al.

Science 10.1126/science.273.5280.1392
[19]
HEAT CAPACITY IN PROTEINS

Ninad V. Prabhu, Kim A. Sharp

Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 10.1146/annurev.physchem.56.092503.141202
[21]
Protein binding versus protein folding: the role of hydrophilic bridges in protein associations 1 1Edited by B. Honig

Dong Xu, Shuo L Lin, Ruth Nussinov

Journal of Molecular Biology 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0712
[23]
Hydration of protein–protein interfaces

Francis Rodier, Ranjit Prasad Bahadur, Pinak Chakrabarti et al.

Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 10.1002/prot.20478
[24]
Antibody Multispecificity Mediated by Conformational Diversity

Leo C. James, Pietro Roversi, Dan S. Tawfik

Science 10.1126/science.1079731
[28]
Protein-Protein Interfaces: Architectures and Interactions in Protein-Protein Interfaces and in Protein Cores. Their Similarities and Differences

Chung-Jung Tsai, Shuo Liang Lin, Haim J. Wolfson et al.

Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Bio... 10.3109/10409239609106582
[30]
Identification of a Universal VHH Framework to Graft Non-canonical Antigen-binding Loops of Camel Single-domain Antibodies

Dirk Saerens, Mireille Pellis, Remy Loris et al.

Journal of Molecular Biology 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.07.038
[32]
Phasercrystallographic software

Airlie J. McCoy, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve, Paul D. Adams et al.

Journal of Applied Crystallography 10.1107/s0021889807021206
[33]
PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination

Paul D. Adams, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve, Li-Wei Hung et al.

Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crysta... 10.1107/s0907444902016657
[34]
Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics

Paul Emsley, Kevin Cowtan

Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crysta... 10.1107/s0907444904019158
[35]
Developments in theCCP4 molecular-graphics project

Liz Potterton, Stuart McNicholas, Eugene Krissinel et al.

Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crysta... 10.1107/s0907444904023716
Metrics
407
Citations
35
References
Details
Published
Nov 18, 2010
Vol/Issue
19(12)
Pages
2389-2401
License
View
Cite This Article
Marta H. Kubala, Oleksiy Kovtun, Kirill Alexandrov, et al. (2010). Structural and thermodynamic analysis of the GFP:GFP‐nanobody complex. Protein Science, 19(12), 2389-2401. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.519
Related

You May Also Like

UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers

Eric F. Pettersen, Thomas D. Goddard · 2020

9,270 citations

UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis

Thomas D. Goddard, Conrad C. Huang · 2017

5,387 citations

MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all‐atom structure validation

Christopher J. Williams, Jeffrey J. Headd · 2017

4,536 citations

Verification of protein structures: Patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions

Chris Colovos, Todd O. Yeates · 1993

3,760 citations