Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformations II: Minimization and molecular dynamics studies of MCPC603 from many randomly generated loop conformations

R. M. Fine; H. Wang; P. S. Shenkin; D. L. Yarmush; C. Levinthal

doi:10.1002/prot.340010408

journal article Apr 01, 1986

Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformations II: Minimization and molecular dynamics studies of MCPC603 from many randomly generated loop conformations

R. M. Fine H. Wang

P. S. Shenkin D. L. Yarmush C. Levinthal

Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Vol. 1 No. 4 pp. 342-362 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/prot.340010408

Abstract

AbstractWe describe a method for predicting the conformations of loops in proteins and its application to four of the complementarity determining regions [CDRs] in the crystallographically determined structure of MCPC603. The method is based on the generation of a large number of randomly generated conformations for the backbone of the loop being studied, followed by either minimization or molecular dynamics followed by minimization starting from these random structures. The details of the algorithm for the generation of the loops are presented in the first paper in this series (Shenkin etal.[submitted]). The results of minimization and molecular dynamics applied to these loops is presented here. For the two shortest CDRs studied (H1 and L2, which are five and seven amino acids long), minimizations and dynamics simulations which ignore interactions of the loop amino acids beyond the carbon ture closely. This suggests that these loops fold independently of sequence variation. For the third CDR (L3, which is nine amino acids), those portions of the CDR near its base which are hydrogen bonded to framework are well replicated by our procedures, but the top of the loop shows singificant conformational variability. This variability persists when side chain interactions for the MCPC603 sequence are included. For a fourth CDR (H3, which is 11 amino acids long), new low‐energy backbone conformations are found; however, only those which are close to the crystal are compatible with the sequence when side chain interactions are taken into account. Results from minimuzation and dynamics on single CDRs with all other CDRs removed are presented. These allow us to explore the extent to which individual CDR conformations are determined by interactions with framework only.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

43

[1]

10.1084/jem.132.2.211

[2]

Kabat E. (1983)

[3]

10.1073/pnas.71.11.4298

[4]

10.1016/0022-2836(86)90245-7

[5]

10.1016/0022-2836(80)90252-1

[6]

10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80104-1

[7]

Saul F. A. "Preliminary refinement and structural analysis of the Fab fragment from the human immugoglobulin New at 2.0 Å" J. Biol. Chem. (1978) 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)38249-2

[8]

10.1021/bi00693a025

[9]

10.1126/science.2426778

[10]

10.1002/prot.340010112

[11]

The Anatomy and Taxonomy of Protein Structure

Jane S. Richardson

Advances in Protein Chemistry 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60520-3

[12]

10.1146/annurev.bi.48.070179.004525

[13]

10.1146/annurev.iy.01.040183.000511

[14]

Evolution of proteins formed by β-sheets

Arthur M. Lesk, Cyrus Chothia

Journal of Molecular Biology 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90179-6

[15]

10.1016/0022-2836(85)90137-8

[16]

Novotny' J. "Anatomy of the antibody binding site" J. Biol. Chem. (1983) 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)43880-4

[17]

10.1101/sqb.1977.041.01.072

[18]

10.1016/0161-5890(84)90062-2

[19]

10.1016/0161-5890(81)90060-2

[20]

10.1084/jem.154.6.1946

[21]

de la Paz P. "Modeling of the combined sites of anti‐lysozyme monoclonal antibodies and of the complex bedtween one of the antibodies and its epitope" EMBO J. (1986) 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04227.x

[22]

10.1016/0968-0004(86)90070-8

[23]

10.1126/science.3090684

[24]

Shenkin P. S. Yarmush D. L. Fine R. M. Levinthal C.Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformation I. Ensembles of random conformations for ring‐like structures. (submitted).

[25]

The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures

Frances C. Bernstein, Thomas F. Koetzle, Graheme J.B. Williams et al.

Journal of Molecular Biology 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3

[26]

Hagler A. (1984)

[27]

CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations

Bernard R. Brooks, Robert E. Bruccoleri, Barry D. Olafson et al.

Journal of Computational Chemistry 10.1002/jcc.540040211

[28]

GEMM (Generate Emulate Manipulate Macromolecules) is the name of an implementation of molecular dynamics and minimization code written for a Star ST‐100 array processor by Bernard Books at the National Institute of Health (unpublished).

[29]

Polak E. "Note sur la Convergence des Directions Conjugue'es, Rev" Fr. Inf.Rich. Oper. (1969)

[30]

Array Processor Control Language (APCL) is a proprietary high level language from Star ST‐100 array processor.

[31]

10.1146/annurev.bb.01.060172.002341

[32]

Energy functions for peptides and proteins. I. Derivation of a consistent force field including the hydrogen bond from amide crystals

A. T. Hagler, E. Huler, S. Lifson

Journal of the American Chemical Society 10.1021/ja00824a004

[33]

10.1016/0022-2836(85)90297-9

[34]

Focusing of electric fields in the active site of Cu‐Zn superoxide dismutase: Effects of ionic strength and amino‐acid modification

Isaac Klapper, Ray Hagstrom, Richard Fine et al.

Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 10.1002/prot.340010109

[35]

Rashin A. (1984)

[36]

Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins

Cyrus Chothia

Nature 10.1038/248338a0

[37]

10.1002/bip.360230813

[38]

Vita C. "Independent folding of carboxyl terminal fragment of thermolysin; Appendix: Prediction of the stabilities of thermolysin" Bio‐chemistry (1985)

[39]

Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin

A. Shrake, J.A. Rupley

Journal of Molecular Biology 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90011-9

[40]

10.1002/prot.340010207

[41]

Levinthal C. (1984)

[42]

Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uniform conformational sampling

Robert E. Bruccoleri, Martin Karplus

Biopolymers 10.1002/bip.360260114

[43]

Go N. Ring closure and local conformational deformation of chain molecules. Macromolecules (1970)

Cited By

183

Comparative Protein Structure Modelling

András Fiser · 2017

From Protein Structure to Function...

Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER

Benjamin Webb, Andrej Šali · 2016

Current Protocols in Bioinformatics

Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER

Benjamin Webb, Andrej Šali · 2014

Current Protocols in Bioinformatics

LEAP: Highly accurate prediction of protein loop conformations by integrating coarse‐grained sampling and optimized energy scores with all‐atom refinement of backbone and side chains

Shide Liang, Chi Zhang · 2013

Journal of Computational Chemistry

A Modular Perspective of Protein Structures: Application to Fragment Based Loop Modeling

Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes, András Fiser · 2012

Methods in Molecular Biology™

Modeling Structures and Motions of Loops in Protein Molecules

Amarda Shehu, Lydia E. Kavraki · 2012

Entropy

Protein Loop Modeling with Optimized Backbone Potential Functions

Shide Liang, Chi Zhang · 2012

Journal of Chemical Theory and Comp...

Protein loop closure using orientational restraints from NMR data

Chittaranjan Tripathy, Jianyang Zeng · 2011

Proteins: Structure, Function, and...

Template-Based Protein Structure Modeling

András Fiser · 2010

Methods in Molecular Biology™

A Self-Organizing Algorithm for Modeling Protein Loops

Pu Liu, Fangqiang Zhu · 2009

PLOS Computational Biology

Modeling protein conformational ensembles: From missing loops to equilibrium fluctuations

Amarda Shehu, Cecilia Clementi · 2006

Proteins: Structure, Function, and...

Inverse Kinematics in Biology: The Protein Loop Closure Problem

Rachel Kolodny, Leonidas Guibas · 2005

The International Journal of Roboti...

Protein structure modeling in the proteomics era

András Fiser · 2004

Expert Review of Proteomics

Generation of accurate protein loop conformations through low‐barrier molecular dynamics

Viktor Hornak, Carlos Simmerling · 2003

Proteins: Structure, Function, and...

CODA: A combined algorithm for predicting the structurally variable regions of protein models

Charlotte M. Deane, Tom L. Blundell · 2001

Protein Science

Comparative Protein Structure Modeling

András Fiser, Roberto Sánchez · 2001

Computational Biochemistry and Biop...

New efficient statistical sequence-dependent structure prediction of short to medium-sized protein loops based on an exhaustive loop classification 1 1Edited by J. M. Thornton

Jérôme Wojcik, Jean-Paul Mornon · 1999

Journal of Molecular Biology

PDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization

Herman W.T. van Vlijmen, Martin Karplus · 1997

Journal of Molecular Biology

Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling

Roberto Sánchez, Andrej Šali · 1997

Current Opinion in Structural Biolo...

Loop problem in proteins: Developments on Monte Carlo simulated annealing approach

Louis Carlacci, S. Walter Englander · 1996

Journal of Computational Chemistry

Metrics

183

Citations

43

References

Details

Published: Apr 01, 1986
Vol/Issue: 1(4)
Pages: 342-362
License: View

Authors

University of Birmingham

Cite This Article

R. M. Fine, H. Wang, P. S. Shenkin, et al. (1986). Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformations II: Minimization and molecular dynamics studies of MCPC603 from many randomly generated loop conformations. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 1(4), 342-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340010408

Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformations II: Minimization and molecular dynamics studies of MCPC603 from many randomly generated loop conformations

You May Also Like