Prey preferences of notonectids towards larval mosquitoes across prey ontogeny and search area

Arpita Dalal; Ross N Cuthbert; Jaimie T. A. Dick; Susmita Gupta

doi:10.1002/ps.5556

journal article Aug 21, 2019

Prey preferences of notonectids towards larval mosquitoes across prey ontogeny and search area

Arpita Dalal

Ross N Cuthbert Jaimie T. A. Dick Susmita Gupta

Pest Management Science Vol. 76 No. 2 pp. 609-616 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/ps.5556

Abstract

AbstractBACKGROUNDPredatory biological control agents can be effective natural means of managing pests, vectors and invasive species. However, the strength of predator–prey interactions can be regulated through context‐dependencies that often remain unquantified. In particular, refuge effects can influence the efficacy of biological agents towards target species, and such effects are often driven by prey size and search area differences. In this study, we quantify the prey preferences of two predaceous notonectids, Anisops breddini and Anisops sardeus, towards four different aquatic larval instar stages of the medically important mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus across variations in surface area and water depth.RESULTSConsumption rates differed significantly among the four larval sizes but not between the notonectids. Search area variations also elicited differences in consumption rates. Both predators tended to prefer second‐instar mosquito prey among surface area and water depth variations, while generally avoiding the largest (fourth instar) and smallest (first instar) prey instar stages. For both predators, differential selectivity traits were emergent across surface area variations and water depth, with refuge effects for small prey generally greatest at intermediate–large depths with high surface areas. We thus demonstrate that predatory impacts of notonectids towards mosquito larvae differ significantly according to prey size, and likely peak at intermediate size classes.CONCLUSIONDifferent mosquito size classes often coexist and compete, selectivity has important implications for adult mosquito proliferations. Further, in ephemeral aquatic habitats where surface areas and water depths are highly variable spatiotemporally, the efficacy of notonectids in controlling mosquito prey may differ substantially. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

63

[1]

Kerfoot W (1987)

[2]

10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01437-2

[3]

10.2307/1309989

[4]

10.1371/journal.pone.0061019

[5]

10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.02.008

[6]

10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000451

[7]

World Health Organization (2017)

[8]

10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.02.002

[9]

10.2987/8756-971x-28.4.123

[10]

Manimegalai K "Biology of the filarial vector, Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)" Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci (2014)

[11]

10.1111/j.1365-2915.1992.tb00620.x

[12]

10.1186/1476-072x-5-18

[13]

10.5923/j.phr.20120204.01

[14]

Medlock JM "Natural predators and parasites of British mosquitoes – a review" J Eur Mosq Control Assoc (2008)

[15]

10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.02.012

[16]

10.1016/s0140-6736(05)17913-6

[17]

10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00620.x

[18]

10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970112.x

[19]

10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00257.x

[20]

Can Generalist Predators be Effective Biocontrol Agents?

W. O. C. Symondson, K. D. Sunderland, M. H. Greenstone

Annual Review of Entomology 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145240

[21]

10.1371/journal.pone.0082231

[22]

10.1016/0040-5809(87)90019-0

[23]

10.1016/j.biosystems.2012.08.002

[24]

10.1007/s10867-013-9327-7

[25]

10.1007/s002270050389

[26]

10.1111/oik.02443

[27]

10.2307/3133

[28]

Hassell MP (1978)

[29]

10.1098/rspb.1995.0070

[30]

Elton C (1927)

[31]

10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00818.x

[32]

10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01408.x

[33]

10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01618.x

[34]

10.2987/8756-971x(2007)23[265:pd]2.0.co;2

[35]

10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00138.x

[36]

10.1002/ecs2.1239

[37]

10.1111/oik.04832

[38]

Das K "Seasonal variation of Hemiptera community of a temple pond of Cachar District, Assam, northeastern India" JoTT (2012)

[39]

Dalal A (2018)

[40]

10.1111/j.1948-7134.2012.00223.x

[41]

10.1086/303215

[42]

10.1086/285984

[43]

10.1093/aesa/63.4.963

[44]

Silberbush A "Interactive effects of salinity and a predator on mosquito oviposition and larval performance" Popul Ecol (2014)

[45]

10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.11.034

[46]

10.1016/j.actao.2018.11.004

[47]

10.1371/journal.pone.0037741

[48]

10.1002/ps.5368

[49]

10.2307/2529649

[50]

10.2307/1937838

Showing 50 of 63 references

Metrics

13

Citations

63

References

Details

Published: Aug 21, 2019
Vol/Issue: 76(2)
Pages: 609-616
License: View

Authors

A

Arpita Dalal

Department of Ecology and Environmental Science Assam University Silchar India

R

Ross N Cuthbert

Institute for Global Food Security School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK

J

Jaimie T. A. Dick

Institute for Global Food Security School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK

S

Susmita Gupta

Department of Ecology and Environmental Science Assam University Silchar India

Funding

DST Award: IF130185

Cite This Article

Arpita Dalal, Ross N Cuthbert, Jaimie T. A. Dick, et al. (2019). Prey preferences of notonectids towards larval mosquitoes across prey ontogeny and search area. Pest Management Science, 76(2), 609-616. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5556

Prey preferences of notonectids towards larval mosquitoes across prey ontogeny and search area

You May Also Like