journal article Nov 14, 2024

Evaluating the use of in‐season measures of pest abundance to predict end‐of‐season damage: a study in commercial almond (Prunus dulcis)

Pest Management Science Vol. 81 No. 3 pp. 1324-1332 · Wiley
Abstract
AbstractBACKGROUNDPre‐harvest pest management tools are essential to minimizing crop loss. The development of predictive models using early warning signs of pest abundance to predict imminent crop loss can guide management decisions and enable targeted, well‐calibrated intervention. With sufficient data, in‐season measures of pest abundance can be an important factor in generating accurate predictions of damage. However, sampling plans for tracking insect phenology and those designed to guide informed pest‐management may not be equivalent. Using data from a commercial almond orchard setting, we evaluated five different lure‐trap combinations used for monitoring navel orangeworm (Amyelois transitella; a primary pest of almond) under different management conditions. Using these data, we developed a predictive model of almond damage and evaluated the contribution of in‐season measures of pest abundance towards accurate predictions of end‐of‐season damage.RESULTSMating disruption in orchard management influenced the efficacy of multiple lure‐trap combinations. Despite this effect, there was as strong correlation between measured pest abundance and damage across multiple trap types regardless of management method. While statistically significant, measures of pest abundance did not enhance the accuracy of predictive models and characteristics of almond variety were stronger predictors of damage at harvest.CONCLUSIONRepeated significant correlations between navel orangeworm abundance and almond damage across multiple trap types justifies continued exploration of predictive modeling as a management tool. Lure‐trap combinations exhibiting resistance to external factors are clear candidates for further development. However, generating accurate predictions of damage using these data will likely require calibration or modification of current sampling protocols. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
53
[3]
Crop losses to pests

E.-C. OERKE

The Journal of Agricultural Science 10.1017/s0021859605005708
[4]
Grube A (2011)
[10]
Economic Injury Levels in Theory and Practice

L P Pedigo, S H Hutchins, L G Higley

Annual Review of Entomology 10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.002013
[12]
Lance DR (2001)
[14]
United States Department of Agriculture – National Agricultural Statistics Service Almond Value of Utilized Production: United States United States Department of AgricultureAvailable:https://www.nass.usda.gov/Charts_and_Maps/Noncitrus_Fruits/histvopal.php(2009‐2018). 12 June 2024.
[15]
Almond Board of California Almond Almanachttps://www.almonds.com/sites/default/files/2023-12/Almanac_2023.pdf[12 June 2024].
[16]
HavilandDR SymmesEJ AdaskavegJE DuncanRA RoncoroniJA GublerWDet al. UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Almond UC ANR Publication 3431https://ipm.ucanr.edu/agriculture/almond/introduction/#gsc.tab=0[12 June 2024].
[18]
Parker L (2019)
[20]
Machado M (2019)
[28]
R Core Team (2021)
[30]
HartigF DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi‐Level/Mixed) Regression Models. R package version 0.4.6https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa(2022).
[31]
LenthR emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means aka Least‐Squares Means. R package version 1.10.2https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans(2024).
[34]
TherneauT A Package for Survival Analysis in R R package version 3.5‐8https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival(2024).
[36]
LampinenBD ConnellJH VerdegaalP ViverosM MetcalfSG NegronCet al. Progress Report Regional Almond Variety Trials(2006).
[37]
Kester D "Almond variety evaluation" Calif Agric (1980)
[41]
FrisvoldG HurleyTandMitchellP Cotton Grower Adoption of Weed Resistance Management Practices: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences; 2002 Jan 5–8; San Antonio TX(2009).
[44]
Yellow sticky traps for decision-making in whitefly management: What has been achieved?

Delia M. Pinto-Zevallos, Irene Vänninen

Crop Protection 10.1016/j.cropro.2013.01.009
[49]
Duarte F "Geostatistics applied to the study of the spatial distribution of insects and its use in integrated pest management" Rev Agron Noroeste Arg (2015)

Showing 50 of 53 references

Metrics
2
Citations
53
References
Details
Published
Nov 14, 2024
Vol/Issue
81(3)
Pages
1324-1332
License
View
Funding
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Cite This Article
Geoffrey T Broadhead, Bradley S Higbee, John J Beck (2024). Evaluating the use of in‐season measures of pest abundance to predict end‐of‐season damage: a study in commercial almond (Prunus dulcis). Pest Management Science, 81(3), 1324-1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8532
Related

You May Also Like

The strobilurin fungicides

Dave W Bartlett, John M Clough · 2002

1,374 citations

Glyphosate: a once‐in‐a‐century herbicide

Stephen O Duke, Stephen B Powles · 2008

1,372 citations

Applied aspects of neonicotinoid uses in crop protection

Alfred Elbert, Matthias Haas · 2008

772 citations

Imidazolinone‐tolerant crops: history, current status and future

Siyuan Tan, Richard R Evans · 2004

461 citations