Atmospheric absorption and scattering impact on optical satellite‐ground links

Dirk Giggenbach; Amita Shrestha

doi:10.1002/sat.1426

journal article Open Access Oct 07, 2021

Atmospheric absorption and scattering impact on optical satellite‐ground links

Dirk Giggenbach Amita Shrestha

International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking Vol. 40 No. 2 pp. 157-176 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/sat.1426

Abstract

SummaryFree‐space radio‐frequency (RF) communication links for intersatellite or satellite‐to‐ground communications are getting increasingly constraint by the insufficient spectrum availability and limited data rate of RF technology. With the advent of large satellite mega‐constellation networks for global communications coverage, this limitation of classical RF communication becomes even more critical. Therefore, the establishment of point‐to‐point free‐space optical link technology (FSO) in space will become of paramount importance in future systems, where the application will be for data‐relays links, or for mega‐constellations inter‐satellite links, as well as for direct data downlinks, or from deep‐space probes to ground. Further advantages of optical FSO—besides spectrum availability—is its increased power efficiency, higher data rates, avoidance of interference, and inherent protection against interception. When, however, these optical communication links have to pass through Earth's atmosphere, attenuation and scattering effects do influence the signal transmission. In this publication, we investigate the effects of atmospheric attenuation, including the effects of molecular absorption as well as aerosol scattering and absorption, for typical wavelength regions used for FSO, dependent on the link geometries. Based on transmission‐simulation databases, we show useful spectral ranges and their specific attenuation strength. Free spectral transmission windows dependent on atmospheric quality and elevation angle are identified for reliable and efficient use of the optical transmission technology in space applications.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

38

[1]

MukherjeeM.Wireless communication‐moving from RF to optical.2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development INDIACom 2016 pp.788–795.

[2]

GiggenbachD.Standards for optical space communications satellite and space communications. IEEE Satellite and Space Communications Technical Committee Newsletter vol. 30 no. 2 Dec.2020.

[3]

10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.04.049

[4]

10.1364/jocn.7.000325

[5]

10.1049/pbte079e_ch11

[6]

GiggenbachD KirstädterA FuchsC ElbersJP GrallertHJ.Neue Kommunikationssysteme für den mobilen Internetzugang‐Stratosphärische Kommunikationsplattformen und LEO‐Mega‐Constellations. White Paper. VDE Verband der Elektrotechnik Elektronik Informationstechnik e.V. Feb.2017.

[7]

BobrovskyiS BarriosR GiggenbachD MollF SellmaierF HuberF.EFAL: EDRS Feeder Link from Antarctic Latitudes‐System Architecture and Operations Concept. in Proceedings of the SpaceOps Conference 2014. 10.2514/6.2014-1822

[8]

GiggenbachD FuchsC SchmidtC JaiswalR ShresthaA GaißerS KeimJ.Optical Data Downlinks from OSIRIS on Flying Laptop Satellite Online Proceedings of TT&C2019 2019.

[9]

Jono T "Report on DLR‐JAXA Joint Experiment: The Kirari Optical Downlink to Oberpfaffenhofen (KIODO)" Book by Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, ISSN (2007)

[10]

OaidaBV AbrahamsonMJ WitoffRJ MartinezJNB ZayasDA.OPALS: An optical communications technology demonstration from the International Space Station. in IEEE Explore Aerospace Conference 2013. 10.1109/aero.2013.6497167

[11]

MollF KnapekM.Free‐space laser communications for satellite downlinks: Measurements of the atmospheric channel. Proc. of 62nd International Astronautical Congress (IAC) 2011.

[12]

PerdiguesJ SodnikZ HauschildtH SarasaP WittingM BillerP BaumgaertelC SauckeK RochowC TroendleD.ESA's OGS upgrades for EDRS: Development status. in2017IEEE International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications (ICSOS) pp.89–98.2017. 10.1109/icsos.2017.8357217

[13]

ShresthaA BrechtelsbauerM.Transportable optical ground station for high‐speed free‐pace laser communication. Proc. of the SPIE Laser Communication and Propagation through the Atmosphere and Oceans 2012. 10.1117/12.928966

[14]

RödigerB MenningerC FuchsC GrillmayerL ArnoldS RochowC WertzP SchmidtC.High data‐rate optical communication payload for CubeSats. SPIE Optics + Photonics Conference Digital Forum 2020. 10.1117/12.2567035

[15]

10.5772/34740

[16]

10.1117/3.626196

[17]

Biswas A (2006)

[18]

10.1364/ao.13.002134

[19]

10.1364/josaa.19.000567

[20]

MollF KnapekM.Wavelength selection criteria and link availability due to cloud coverage statistics and attenuation affecting satellite aerial and downlink scenarios. Proc. of the SPIE vol.6709 Free‐Space Laser Communications VII 2007. 10.1117/12.734269

[21]

ShresthaA GiggenbachD MollF FuchsC HanikN.Atmospheric transmission spectrum for space to ground free space optical communications. Proc. of the International Conference on Space Optics (ICSO) 2018.

[22]

ArtaudG BenammarB JougletD CanuetL LacanJ.Impact of molecular absorption on the design of free space optical communications. Proc. of the International Conference on Space Optics (ICSO) 2018.

[23]

Emde C "The libRadtran software package for radiative transfer calculations (version 2.0. 1). Geoscientific Model" Development (2016)

[24]

10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.03.005

[25]

10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.12.012

[26]

Recommendation ITU‐R P "Propagation data required for the design of Earth‐space systems operating between 20 THz and 375 THz" Int Telecomm Union (1621)

[27]

Recommendation ITU‐R P "Prediction methods required for the design of Earth‐space systems operating between 20 THz and 375 THz" Int Telecomm Union (1622)

[28]

10.1109/tthz.2018.2814343

[29]

AndersonGP CloughSA KneizysF ChetwyndJH&ShettleEPAFGL atmospheric constituent profiles (0.120 km). AIR FORCE GEOPHYSICS LAB HANSCOM AFB MA 1986.

[30]

Froen SM (2017)

[31]

Shettle EP "Models of the atmospheric aerosols and their optical properties" AGARD Opt Propagation Atmosphere (1976)

[32]

Earth‐GRAM NASA software web page:https://software.nasa.gov/featuredsoftware/earth-gram-2016

[33]

10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0831:opoaac>2.0.co;2

[34]

10.1007/bf00187579

[35]

The HITRAN2012 molecular spectroscopic database

L.S. Rothman, I.E. Gordon, Y. Babikov et al.

Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative... 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.07.002

[36]

GiggenbachD MollF FuchsC deColaT CalvoRM.Space Communications Protocols for Future Optical Satellite Downlinks. Proc. of the 62nd International Astronautical Congress (IAC) 2011.

[37]

Spectral Grids for WDM Applications: DWDM Frequency Grid. ITU‐T Recommendation G.694.1.2012.

[38]

Optical Communications Physical Layer (2020)

Metrics

31

Citations

38

References

Details

Published: Oct 07, 2021
Vol/Issue: 40(2)
Pages: 157-176
License: View

Authors

D

Dirk Giggenbach

Institute for Communications and Navigation German Aerospace Center (DLR) Wessling Germany

A

Amita Shrestha

Institute for Communications and Navigation German Aerospace Center (DLR) Wessling Germany

Cite This Article

Dirk Giggenbach, Amita Shrestha (2021). Atmospheric absorption and scattering impact on optical satellite‐ground links. International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking, 40(2), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/sat.1426

Atmospheric absorption and scattering impact on optical satellite‐ground links

You May Also Like