journal article Nov 07, 2025

What Happens When Early Childhood Science Teachers Value Student Authorship?

Science Education Vol. 110 No. 3 pp. 726-738 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1002/sce.70034
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the impact of generative learning environments on early childhood students’ language development and scientific understanding through the lens of student authorship. Focusing on three second‐grade teachers, we explore how generative and replicative practices influence the degree of multimodality in students’ science writing. Prior research indicates that learning environments characterized by knowledge generation encourage students to leverage their linguistic and cognitive resources and promote the development of representational fluency. However, few studies on this topic have been conducted with early childhood students. Findings of the current multiple case study reveal that students in generative environments tend to express their scientific ideas through more diverse modalities (i.e., representational and extensional rather than decorational) than those in replicative environments. Further, educators who adhere to replicative practices overlook the potential of students’ varied linguistic resources, which reinforces educational inequities for marginalized students. The study underscores the necessity for early childhood educators to deepen their knowledge of language as an epistemic tool and value student authorship opportunities in science.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
54
[8]
Delpit L. (1995)
[11]
Dyson A. H. (2013)
[12]
Engelmann S. (1969)
[15]
Gorski P. "The Classist Underpinnings of Ruby Payne's Framework" Teachers College Record (2006)
[18]
Does a Knowledge Generation Approach to Learning Benefit Students? A Systematic Review of Research on the Science Writing Heuristic Approach

Brian Hand, Ying-Chih Chen, Jee Kyung Suh

Educational Psychology Review 10.1007/s10648-020-09550-0
[19]
Hart B. (1995)
[21]
Karpov A. "Generative Learning in Research Education for the Knowledge Society" International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education (2016)
[23]
Kenny J. (2018)
[24]
Kress G. R. (1997)
[27]
Lee H. W. (2008)
[32]
Matusov E. "Dialogue on ‘Dialogic Education’: Has Rupert Gone over to ‘The Dark Side’? Dialogic Pedagogy" An International Online Journal (2014)
[33]
McCabe T. A. (1974)
[34]
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic

Marry L. McHugh

Biochemia Medica 10.11613/bm.2012.031
[36]
Miller P. J. (2012)
[37]
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (2004).Fifty Years After Brown V. Board Of Education: A Two‐tiered Education System. Author.
[38]
Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Lead States (2013)
[40]
Payne R. K.(2001). A Framework for Understanding Poverty. Aha! Process.
[41]
Payne R. K. "No Child Left Behind: What's Really Behind it All?—Part I" Instructional Leader (2003)
[45]
Ray K. W. (2010)
[46]
Saldaña J. (2016)

Showing 50 of 54 references

Metrics
0
Citations
54
References
Details
Published
Nov 07, 2025
Vol/Issue
110(3)
Pages
726-738
License
View
Cite This Article
Catherine Lammert, Brian Hand, Alison Warren (2025). What Happens When Early Childhood Science Teachers Value Student Authorship?. Science Education, 110(3), 726-738. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.70034
Related

You May Also Like