Cultural Differences and Interdependencies in Climate Change Mitigation Efforts and Their Psychological Antecedents Across 63 Countries
Climate change research, like much of social science, is biased toward WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) populations, limiting its global relevance. Even cross‐national studies often suffer from methodological inconsistencies due to cultural and geographic interdependencies. This study examines how such differences shape psychological drivers and national climate mitigation outcomes. Using preregistered analyses on large‐scale datasets and various distance metrics, we find that greater cultural distance correlates with weaker renewable energy adoption, environmental policies, and sustainability spending. Individual psychological factors, such as environmental identity and climate beliefs, also predict national outcomes, even after accounting for interdependence. These findings underscore the need for culturally inclusive and methodologically rigorous approaches in climate research to better inform global sustainability policy.
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
Nicholas Apergis, James E. Payne
David Bidwell
Stuart Capstick, Lorraine Whitmarsh, Wouter Poortinga et al.
Stefan Drews, Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh
Joseph Henrich, Steven J. Heine, Ara Norenzayan
Showing 50 of 94 references
- Published
- Nov 18, 2025
- Vol/Issue
- 34(2)
- Pages
- 2310-2334
- License
- View
You May Also Like
Bill Hopwood, Mary Mellor · 2005
1,451 citations
Nicola Dempsey, Glen Bramley · 2011
1,379 citations
William Young, Kumju Hwang · 2009
1,148 citations
Adesuwa Vanessa Agbedahin · 2019
371 citations