journal article Jan 30, 2018

How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle

Abstract
Research Summary:
This research uses insights from field theory to explore the early moments of how entrepreneurial ecosystems form through everyday interactions. We examine the cultural‐cognitive and material micro‐dynamics of activities occurring in support of social impact entrepreneurs and businesses from 2000 to 2014 in the Seattle, Washington, region using archival and interview data sources. The pattern of results about what actors do and how interactions change over time supports a two‐period model of ecosystem formation where initial distributed and disparate activity undergoes a phase transition to coalesce into a more coordinated and integrated social order. The findings point to endogenous sources of structuring, including language and interaction, rather than exogenous sources such as government action or instrumental policy goals.


Managerial Summary:
How do the ecosystems that support entrepreneurs form? Rather than being created through top‐down actions of governments and other powerful actors, we argue that entrepreneurial ecosystems form through the everyday interactions of individuals striving to create shared meaning, resources, and infrastructure needed to support their new ventures. This is especially true in ecosystems focused on creating social impact, which do not always offer the high returns expected in a market‐based capitalistic system. Our study shows how the initial activities of distributed, disparate individuals and groups rather suddenly coalesce into more coordinated, integrated, and durable patterns of social interaction, creating the methods, resources, and legitimacy needed for an entrepreneurial ecosystem for social impact businesses to coexist with or change existing conventions of market‐based capitalism.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
71
[2]
Ecosystem as Structure

Ron Adner

Journal of Management 10.1177/0149206316678451
[3]
Adragna A.(2011 November). Young and restless: Entrepreneurs start earlier and earlier.Seattle Business Magazine. Retrieved fromhttp://www.seattlebusinessmag.com/article/young-and-restless-entrepreneurs-start-earlier-and-earlier
[5]
Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action

Sharon A. Alvarez, Jay B. Barney

Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 10.1002/sej.4
[6]
Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?

James Austin, Howard Stevenson, Jane Wei–Skillern

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
[7]
Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context

Erkko Autio, Martin Kenney, Philippe Mustar et al.

Research Policy 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015
[8]
Autio E.
[9]
E. Babbie 2001
[11]
Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing – Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises

Julie Battilana, Matthew Lee

Academy of Management Annals 2014 10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
[14]
Becker H. S. (1986)
[15]
Berger P. L. (1966)
[18]
'Old Economy' Inputs for 'New Economy' Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New Silicon Valleys

T. Bresnahan

Industrial and Corporate Change 10.1093/icc/10.4.835
[19]
Casasnovas G. (2016)
[21]
The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields

Paul J. DiMaggio, Walter W. Powell

American Sociological Review 10.2307/2095101
[25]
Friedland R. (1991)
[29]
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research

Dennis A. Gioia, Kevin G. Corley, Aimee L. Hamilton

Organizational Research Methods 10.1177/1094428112452151
[30]
Glaser B. (1967)
[31]
Guthrie D. (2003)
[33]
Heaton B. (2014).New Washington crowdfunding law could aid startups. Government Technology. Retrieved fromhttp://www.govtech.com/internet/New-Washington-Crowdfunding-Law-Could-Aid-Startups.html
[34]
Hinings C. R. (2003)
[35]
INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE U.S. CHEMICAL INDUSTRY.

A. J. Hoffman

Academy of Management Journal 10.2307/257008
[36]
Hoffman A. J. (2002)
[37]
Hughes E. (1971)
[39]
Isenberg D. J. "How to start an entrepreneurial revolution" Harvard Business Review (2010)
[40]
Isenberg D. J. "Applying the ecosystem metaphor to entrepreneurship: Uses and abuses" Antitrust Bulletin (2016) 10.1177/0003603x16676162
[42]
Kim S. (2014) Entrepreneurial imagination in Detroit: Creating an alternative through anti‐isomorphic divergence.Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings. Retrieved fromhttp://proceedings.aom.org/content/2014/1/15749.abstract 10.5465/ambpp.2014.15749abstract
[43]
Klingle M. W. (2008)
[44]
Locke K. (2001)
[45]
The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems

Elizabeth Mack, Heike Mayer

Urban Studies 10.1177/0042098015586547
[46]
Mason C. &Brown R. (2014).Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth‐oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD. Retrieved fromhttp://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf

Showing 50 of 71 references

Metrics
258
Citations
71
References
Details
Published
Jan 30, 2018
Vol/Issue
12(1)
Pages
96-116
License
View
Cite This Article
Tracy A. Thompson, Jill M. Purdy, Marc J. Ventresca (2018). How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1285
Related

You May Also Like

Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action

Sharon A. Alvarez, Jay B. Barney · 2007

1,644 citations

Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems

Ben Spigel, Richard Harrison · 2017

862 citations

Globalization of social entrepreneurship opportunities

Shaker A. Zahra, Hans N. Rawhouser · 2008

396 citations